Date archives "October 2006"

P2P as solution for file-served television

Here’s a blog entry pointing out that the popularity of YouTube and other forms of videosharing are creating a bandwidth crisis, and that P2P technologies might be the solution: “Ah, but remember Moore’s Law, which is going to increase our bandwidth dramatically over time! It doesn’t matter. Throw 250 million viewers watching 180 channels up… Continue reading

Conference Announcement: MIT’s Future of Entertainment

C3’s The Futures of Entertainment Conference at MIT Nov. 17 and 18 Forwarded by Sam Ford, see also here: “The Comparative Media Studies Program is proud to announce an exciting forthcoming conference, The Futures of Entertainment, to be held at MIT on Nov. 17 and 18. The event is designed to bring together leading thinkers… Continue reading

Re-Inventing Political Activism In The P2P Era

Paul Hartzog has posted an interesting blog today about change, and about, perhaps, the absence of political activism/Civic Engagement from the development of P2P thinking. I am going to repost Paul’s entire blog posting below, for the purposes of discussing political activism/Civic Engagement in the context of the thinking that Paul is talking about: “Mass… Continue reading

Dmytri Kleiner’s critique of Benkler – discussion with Bauwens, continued, part three

Dear Dmytri, Thanks for your valuable and thoughtful contribution to this debate. Here are some of my responses, which hopefully clarifies both the distinctions and convergence in our respective thinking about social change. First of all, the ‘confusion’ bit. I’m basically using the intersubjective typology of Alan Page Fiske, explained in his book, Structures of… Continue reading

Dmytri Kleiner’s critique of Benkler – discussion with Bauwens, continued, part two

Michel Bauwens of the P2P foundation has made some comments regarding my views on free production as expressed in my recent review of the presentations of Lessig and Benkler at Wizards of OS 4, you can find the here Michel begins wondering if my argument about the “sustainability of peer production may rest on a… Continue reading

Peer production: conditions for success (according to Yochai Benkler)

Here’s a good summary by Tom Abate: “Benkler lays out three characteristics of successul group efforts: “They (tasks) 1) must be modular. That is, they must be divisible into components, or modules, each of which can be produced independently of the production of the others. This enables production to be incremental and asynchronous, pooling the… Continue reading

Lawrence Lessig on the Free Beer project

For those who missed the coverage of this interesting ‘physical’ expression of the open/free production mode, do read Lessig’s commentary in Wired: “In June, a Copenhagen artists’ collective called Superflex released version 3.0 of a new beer called – you guessed it – Free Beer. “Free beer?” you ask. “Think free,” Superflex members helpfully explained… Continue reading

Dmytri Kleiner’s critique of Yochai Benkler

In the same article that we discussed yesterday, D. Kleiner offers a critique of Benkler’s theory of commons-based peer production being limited to the immaterial sphere. He writes: “Yochai Benkler’s conception of Social Production, where a network of peers apply their labour to a common stock for mutual and individual benefit, certainly resonates with age-old… Continue reading

Dmytri Kleiner’s critique of the Lessig’ Creative Commons license

In our P2P Encyclopedia entry on the Creative Commons license, we feature some critical comments from Benjamin Mako Hill and the Debian Foundation, about the insuffiency of the CC-licenses. Here’s a more recent critique by Dmytri Kleiner, who argues that: “For free cultural to create a valuable common stock it must destroy the privilege of… Continue reading