Why Degrowth is Factually Realistic and Can (Has) Produce(d) More Human Happiness

degrowth is a call for a radical break from traditional growth-based models of society, no matter if these models are “left” or “right”, to invent new ways of living together in a true democracy, respectful of the values of equality and freedom, based on sharing and cooperation, and with sufficiently moderate consumption so as to be sustainable.

Excerpted from a discussion by David Bollier of a talk by Josh Farley:

“What would “degrowth” look like and why is it needed? At the Degrowth conference in Montreal in May, Josh Farley, an ecological economist at the Gund Institute in Vermont, gave a brisk overview of the problems with our current debt-driven growth economy — and the feasible alternatives — in a seventeen-minute video. Farley and eight other co-authors give a more detailed critique in a paper that they presented, “Monetary and Fiscal Policies for a Finite Planet.”

Normally, I prefer to read a paper than to watch a video summary. But in this case, Farley is so compelling that I found it a pleasure to watch him deconstruct the conceptual errors of mainstream economic thinking and GDP. One fact that he cited really jumped out at me — in 1969 U.S. per capita consumption as measured by GDP was only half of current levels — and yet Americans were just as happy if not happier than they are now. Indeed, since 1969, there have been many declining metrics of health and happiness, such as greater obesity, infant mortality, etc.

For those dead-enders who insist that economic growth is a prerequisite to solving any of our social problems, it’s worth pausing on this fact — that Americans were in fact once healthier and happier despite consuming at half of contemporary rates. This proves that it is not utopian to think that we could lower our consumption and still be happy. It’s an historical fact!

Farley would like to conduct a more systematic study of how we might return to such a society. He calls his proposed research project “QOL 350,” which stands for the quality of life (QOL) that could be sustained at energy consumption levels not exceeding atmospheric concentrations of 350 ppm of carbon – the level that scientists say is needed to prevent climate change. A vital element of any QOL 350 vision, Farley says in his video, is to ensure greater fairness in economic distribution and to create institutions that encourage cooperative action.

Here’s the abstract for the paper Josh Farley and his co-authors submitted at the Degrowth conference:

– “Our current interest bearing, debt-based system of money creation exacerbates booms and busts, systematically transfers wealth and resources to the financial sector. Since interest rates exceed economic growth rates, this monetary system would be unsustainable even on an infinite planet, and it can only finance the creation of market goods and services. We must restore the power of money creation to the public sector, with built in mechanisms for reducing money supply over time as the economy contracts. This will allow the public sector to spend money as needed for public goods, including the restoration of natural capital, without going into debt.

This paper assumes the necessity of a steady-state economy. A steady-state economy must follow clear rules: renewable resource extraction cannot exceed the regeneration rate, pollution outflows cannot exceed absorption capacity, neither extraction nor pollution can threaten essential ecosystem functions, and essential non-renewable resources cannot be depleted faster than we develop substitutes. Currently, levels of throughput exceed all these rules. De-growth, defined as decreasing levels of throughput, is therefore an essential first step towards a steady-state economy.”

Note from the blog editor Michel Bauwens: After reading and listening to Josh Farley and some other material, especially the summary of degrowth principles by Yves-Marie Abraham:, I have changed my mind on degrowth. While previously sceptical about the political aspects of approaches that seem to have a negative message of ‘austerity’, while so many people are still in need, and so many possibilities exist for a thrivable society that is marked by justice and equity, I know understand that degrowth’s message is exactly that.

Watch the video by Josh Farley here:

[ Josh Farley // Rethinking Economic Growth ] from Extraenvironmentalist on Vimeo.

1 Comment Why Degrowth is Factually Realistic and Can (Has) Produce(d) More Human Happiness

  1. Øyvind HolmstadØyvind Holmstad

    Degrowth must be based on a deeper understanding of the handicap principle, founded by the Israeli scientist Amoz Zahivi, who studied the Arabian Babbler for 40 years. On the study of this bird the Norwegian human behavioral scientist Terje Bongard has sketched out a model for a new degrowth society utilizing these strong powers of the bright side of the handicap principle. He calls it an in-group democracy.

    His book, The Biological Human Being, is soon to be launched both in English and German language.

    The problem with most economists and social scientists states Terje Bongard, is that they have no understanding about how the human brain is wired. The handicap principle goes to the core of evolution and is the basis for our actions.

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.