What really happened to the bike-sharing program in Paris

A recent story by the BBC suggested the Velib experience in Paris was doing badly because of vandalism, suggesting a modern day Tragedy of the Commons.

But WorldChanging’s Ben Fried sets the story straight, an excerpt:

If you’ve read this BBC story currently making the rounds, you’d be forgiven for thinking that Vélib, Paris’s wildly popular bike-share system, has suddenly been afflicted by an epidemic of theft and vandalism that threatens its very existence. Vélib bikes have been “torched,” strung up from lamp-posts, and smuggled across borders, the Beeb reports in alarmist tones. A spokesman for JCDecaux, the outdoor advertising firm that operates Vélib, calls its contract with the city of Paris “unsustainable,” and the whole system is referred to in the past tense.

So is Vélib destined to burn brightly only to flare out after a short time? Hardly. Vélib is here to stay, according to officials and transportation experts familiar with the details of its operations. The BBC’s portrayal of a mortal threat, they say, is best understood as a negotiating ploy on the part of JCDecaux. (Note that the JCDecaux representative is the only source quoted in that story.)

“Decaux is using media sensationalism in order to obtain more money from the city of Paris,” said Denis Baupin, who as Deputy Mayor for Transportation oversaw the Vélib launch in the summer of 2007.

The basic structure of the Vélib contract works like this. JCDecaux runs the whole system in exchange for the rights to 1,600 outdoor displays, turning its profit from selling that ad space. The city of Paris keeps the revenue from Vélib user fees, so it can claim to provide the service at no taxpayer expense. Now, with the full Paris network of 20,600 bicycles and 1,451 stations completed, penalties for inadequate maintenance are in the process of taking effect. Hence the hue and cry from JCDecaux.

“It’s in large part a PR issue,” says Luc Nadal of the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy. Some aspects of the Vélib contract are still in flux, and the sky-is-falling press coverage gives JCDecaux a stronger hand in those negotiations. “Their bargaining position depends on the public’s perception.”

Not that bicycle abuse is a phantom problem. It exacts a real toll, but much of that cost has been anticipated and accounted for. Last July, the city of Paris agreed to pay JCDecaux 400 euros for every bike stolen in excess of four percent of the total fleet each year. Given the enormous popularity of Vélib — users have taken 42 million rides since its debut — the cost of those payments is minimal. Using the BBC’s figure of 7,800 missing bikes, the pricetag for the city comes to less than 2 million euros annually, out of 20 million euros in user fees.

“It averages out to about 15 stolen per day, out of 80,000 daily users,” says Eric Britton, founder of the Paris-based New Mobility Agenda. “It’s like skinning your knee.”

Not only does the city already pick up a big part of the tab, but JCDecaux reportedly hauls in about 80 million euros per year from its outdoor displays, according to estimates cited by Britton. It’s difficult to know the exact figure — and how much is profit — because JCDecaux guards the data like a nuclear secret. Even the precise cost of replacing one Vélib bicycle remains unknown to the public. Inquiries we sent to JCDecaux’s headquarters in Paris have not been returned.

Public support for Vélib remains unflagging. “Vélib has been totally embraced by Mayor Bertrand Delanoe himself,” said Nadal. What politician wouldn’t jump at the chance to be identified with a program that enjoys 94 percent satisfaction among constituents?

2 Comments What really happened to the bike-sharing program in Paris

  1. AvatarMichel Bauwens

    From Herve Le Crosnier, by email:

    As a Parisian user of Velib, i endorse this article : The Decaux company, which inherited the contract, try to escape its duties by lowering maintenance, and pressuring maintenance workers. I suppose we soon have a strike by those really hard pressed workers,… which will have significant impact on the use of the Velib system.

    There’s no special vandalism now. There always have been maintenance problems, not directed with vandalism, but simply with a lack of mechanism to exchange used cycle with new ones. Vandalism exists, and sure it will exist with every collective and public system… but as mentioned in the article, we can lower it : when a system is clean, usable, less people try to vandalize it. Once you open the door by poor maintenance, things gets worst…

    But we have to clearly look at the message : “at no taxpayer expense” : is it a good thing ?

    Changing transportation habits is not only a “bobo” (“bourgeois boheme”) problem, but a fundamental rebuilding of the city, with more space for cycles and busses… and less for cars. So, using tax for this shift may have a more profound impact on the rebuilding of the city.

    The same can be said about new transportation infrastructures, which needs to be built before they can achieve financial equilibirum, and even sometimes if they never will (think of late night train transport, which are needed if we want to avoid users coming to town with their cars if they have to go back to their suburbs late, but that sure won’t be self-financing…).

  2. AvatarMichel Bauwens

    From Martin Springer, via http://camorra.org/swann/?p=205

    It is unfortunate that these things happen, but I doubt that calling for law and order will solve the problem. The cost for additional police or better locks would only increase the cost.

    My recommendations to JCDecaux would be:

    * Either circulate less beautiful bikes – I am sure that many Vélib bikes are stolen because they have such a beautiful French design. I would love to ride a Vélib in Berlin…

    * Or host “Vélib freeriding contests” for the kids. If the community can regard the Vélib bikes as their property they will be less inclined to destroy them

    A propôs vandalism: it’s not only a problem in France. The German call-a-bikes are less beautiful than the Vélibs. Still some idiots destroy them, as the Berlin newspaper Der Tagesspiegel reported. After all, I see many people riding call-a-bikes in Berlin and I believe that these bike sharing schemes are successful and economically sustainable.

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.