What if we checked the commons into GitHub?

Not all of the commons, mind you, and not all at once. But each of our little slices of this vast wealth, our areas of interest, that which we wish to share, to curate, and to remix.

Why should programmers have a monopoly on the paradigm shifting technologies and new information topologies known to the open source software world as forking, diffing, and merging?

Imagine a new level of collaboration around open corporate and organizational systems, open government models, open solutions to our biggest challenges. Imagine that we could fork each other’s content and offer these changes back to the original authors, just as programmers can today with GitHub’s pull requests.

What if the commons were a space of global-scale remixing, a living symphony, a thriving ecosystem of creativity and innovation, built on a substrate of proliferation and organic evolution?

Read all of it here on Harlan Wood’s site:

What if we checked the commons into GitHub?

.

1 Comment What if we checked the commons into GitHub?

  1. AvatarCharley Quinton

    I would like to follow up and through on this concept. I shall be following along in a structured way within the context of “social ecology” looking for the gateways through which the purely open, liberated and free efforts go. I’m not sure that GitHub is pure enough, but it may represent a viable step along the way. It seems like every gateway and repository has some kind of tollbooth attached.

    If you wish to collaborate with me on this research, please “ping me” by email, or leave a comment here.

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.