Comments on: The unwisdom of crowds, part three: questions and critique of the digg killer manifesto https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-unwisdom-of-crowds-part-three-questions-and-critique-of-the-digg-killer-manifesto/ Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:39:44 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.17 By: Marc https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-unwisdom-of-crowds-part-three-questions-and-critique-of-the-digg-killer-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-1032 Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:39:44 +0000 http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/?p=325#comment-1032 I did see all the list of ideas the Foundation has been debating/working on in the area of P2P governance.

I do believe there will be a lot of experimenting and trying new ideas, which will probably last for decades.

However, I also believe in the current system we have in the real world despite its flaws.

I truly believe that governance, while it can be experimented with whoever we like in Cyberspace, will eventually go back to the current.

It’s hard to redefine governance in 10-50 years. It takes thousands of years to go from one model to another better model.

In the meantime, the act of trying new ideas, thinking about them, debating then, experimenting with them is the only truth there is.

I don’t believe that the truth is contained in any one idea, vision, ideology, religion, philosophy or set of results. I believe the truth is in the act of thinking, debating, cchallenging, and trying new things.

Thank you for taking the time to make those counter arguments, to which my response is (again):

I truly believe that governance, while it can be experimented with whoever we like in Cyberspace, will eventually go back to the current.

Marc

]]> By: Michel https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-unwisdom-of-crowds-part-three-questions-and-critique-of-the-digg-killer-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-1030 Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:17:40 +0000 http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/?p=325#comment-1030 Marc: anybody can post a comment at any time; however, to avoid blogspam, we do have an approval procedure, but it is just a formality for genuine comments.

]]> By: Marc https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-unwisdom-of-crowds-part-three-questions-and-critique-of-the-digg-killer-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-1025 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:29:02 +0000 http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/?p=325#comment-1025 Please let me know when I may reply. There seems to be a moderate flag set for comments.

Marc

]]> By: P2P Foundation » Blog Archive » Why Digg Is A Poor Example Of “The Wisdom of Crowds” https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-unwisdom-of-crowds-part-three-questions-and-critique-of-the-digg-killer-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-1017 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:58:39 +0000 http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/?p=325#comment-1017 […] [originally posted at Social Synergy Weblog] In this post, I want to address Marc Fawzi’s “Unwisdom of Crowds” post, as part of an analysis/debate that was initiated by Michel Bauwens of the P2P blog. […]

]]>