that’s rather a nice concept!!

“I am not an optimist, neither am I a pessimist, I am rather a serious possibilist, its a new category”
Hans Roslin

I agree, we must act. But we should also tailor action to the forseen consequent causes neccessitated by the spirit of our action. A colic hand won’t excel in calligraphy…and there is something of an art to everything. Violence is the basest of means to any end and like breeds like, the world to step into is not one of peace built on violence, this is not lasting. There are definately better ways of using the tools at our disposal, especially technology.

Teddy bears indeed, and animated fairy tales of grasshoppers and ants.

Divisive action is that of the hand turned against us. We should be connecting. Action is much more powerful when it is binded by the will of a people who know and understand that everybody knows and understands what everybody knows and understands to be the case and reason in point for our persistent failings and fallings. Fallings that see us time and again playing, rather unwittingly, a useless game whereby the token of exchange automates the victor’s success.

Like the old story of the five roads to truth, the time is now ripe for simply playing another game that will use the old logic to outvolve the old ways in a new and dynamic environment.

world change

against a real world of madness

i think i prefer being realistic, than optimistic and utopianistic

https://singularite.wordpress.com/2011/05/05/les-gens-crevent-de-faim-dans-les-pays-riches-la-nourriture-est-le-probleme-et-la-nourriture-est-la-solution/

https://singularite.wordpress.com/2011/03/20/la-nef-des-fous-de-la-lutte-des-classes-aveugle-a-la-conscience-en-passant-par-la-crise/

thing are going faster than a peacefull revolution …

OODA loop you must DECIDE AND ACT

Thank you for this Richard, and thank you Michel for getting this out to us.

Richard, we are following a similar value-system. You ask what is stopping us? I am a resourceful person, but on the edge of credability when it comes to my national context because in Ireland these intuitions are still far from the public eye. Michel is working toward changing this and is regularly giving interviews, lectures and providing a platform for this discussion to take place there.

From what you have said of the workings of your mind it appears that you have a harmonious faculty of intuition and intellection (surely a combination of both). I share this mode and increasingly the information is attatching around a central theme and the need for global response. To help formalise an international dialogue about this it is imperative that we share our ideas creating the feedback loops neccesary to generate solutions within the ‘crowd’ and also to tap the international reserves of hitherto contextually retarded human creativity.

I am available for looping and look forward to making some concrete progress in the near future. I have come to understand our human needs, the direction in which we are going and certain possibilities to facilitate and thus expand that auto-generative process of exchange and development.

I would very much like to hear more from you. Michel has my email address.

it is not a crisis of production

it is not a crisis of energy (sun)

it is not a crisis of ressources ( space and a stable demography)

it is a social crisis of the value, and the destruction of the real economy : people dont have money, more time and more technology = no more jobs