https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/ted-lumley-a-critique-of-p2p-from-the-point-of-view-of-inclusionality/2006/03/22 Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices Mon, 08 Sep 2014 08:33:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.15 https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/ted-lumley-a-critique-of-p2p-from-the-point-of-view-of-inclusionality/2006/03/22/comment-page-1#comment-369 Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:38:04 +0000 http://blog.p2pfoundation.com/?p=137#comment-369 james raises the issue of the need to integrate into our theoretical structures, this fact that when working within a common space where others like ourselves are pursuing their different objectives, our theory must address this apparent need to ‘give way’ for one another (relax our individual agendas) so as to sustain harmony in our shared operating space. as a precursor to this, we can revisit how this issue arose in physics and how we are dealing with it (we are not). this topic (how harmony is sustained amongst multiple ‘individual’ dynamical behaviours within dynamical collectives in nature)is explored at http://www.goodshare.org/blog.htm#james

]]> https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/ted-lumley-a-critique-of-p2p-from-the-point-of-view-of-inclusionality/2006/03/22/comment-page-1#comment-366 Thu, 23 Mar 2006 07:41:49 +0000 http://blog.p2pfoundation.com/?p=137#comment-366 ted’s commentary really got me thinking. It was great to rethink the p2p meme and others processes while remembering the contex of the ’empty’ space. It made me think of Francisco Varela’s discoveries and about how i work each and every day. It reminded me of when i work with people to listen and try to ‘stop’ from always rushing afte goals. I think i somehow do integrate this principle in my life…a good reminder to integrate this point into theoretical structures as well..muchas gracias

]]>