The post Community Capital in Action: New Financial Models for Resilient Cities appeared first on P2P Foundation.
]]>This is an excerpt from the upcoming book Funding the Cooperative City: Community finance and the economy of civic spaces.
Two years ago, the cultural centre La Casa Invisible collected over 20.000 euros for the partial renovation of the building including the installation of fire doors and electric equipments to assure the safety of their revitalized 19th century building in the centre of Málaga. A few months later, East London’s Shuffle Festival, operating in a cemetery park at Mile End, collected 60.000 pounds for the renovation and community use of The Lodge, an abandoned building at the corner of the cemetery. In order to implement their campaigns, both initiatives used the online platforms Goteo and Spacehive that specialise in the financing of specific community projects. The fact that many of the hundreds of projects supported by civic crowdfunding platforms are community spaces, underlines two phenomena: the void left behind by a state that gradually withdrew from certain community services, and the urban impact of community capital created through the aggregation of individual resources.
The question if community capital can really cure the voids left behind by the welfare state has generated fierce debates in the past years. This discussion was partly launched by Brickstarter, the beta platform specialised in architectural crowdfunding, when it introduced to the public the idea of crowdfunded urban infrastructures. Those who opposed Brickstarter, did in fact protest against the Conservative agenda of the “Big Society”, the downsizing of welfare society and the “double taxation” of citizens: “Why should we spend on public services when our taxes should pay for them?”
Nevertheless, in the course of the economic crisis, many European cities witnessed the emergence of a parallel welfare infrastructure: the volunteer-run hospitals and social kitchens in Athens, the occupied schools, gyms and theatres of Rome or the community-run public squares of Madrid are only a few examples of this phenomenon. European municipalities responded to this challenge in a variety of ways. Some cities like Athens began to examine how to adjust their regulations to enable the functioning of community organisations, others created new legal frameworks to share public duties with community organisations in contractual ways, like Bologna with the Regulation of the Commons. In several other cities, administrations began experimenting with crowdfunding public infrastructures, like in Ghent or Rotterdam, where municipalities offer match-funding to support successful campaigns, or with participatory budgeting, like in Paris, Lisbon or Tartu. Yet other public administrations in the UK, the Netherlands or Austria invited the private sphere to invest in social services in the form of Social Impact Bonds, where the work of NGOs or social enterprises is pre-financed by private actors who are paid back with a return on their investment in case the evaluation of the delivered service is positive.
Largo Residencias, Lisbon. Photo (cc) Eutropian
Alternatively, some cities chose to support local economy and create more resilient neighbourhoods with self-sustaining social services through grant systems. The City of Lisbon, for instance, after identifying a number of “priority neighbourhoods” that need specific investments to help social inclusion and ameliorate local employment opportunities, launched the BIP/ZIP program that grants selected civic initiatives with up to 40.000 euros. The granted projects, chosen through an open call, have to prove their economic sustainability and have to spend the full amount in one year. The BIP/ZIP project, operating since 2010, gave birth to a number of self-sustaining civic initiatives, including social kitchens that offer affordable food and employment for locals or cooperative hotels that use their income from tourism to support social and cultural projects. In 2015 the experience of the BIP/ZIP matured in a Community-Led Local Development Network, as identified by the European Union’s Cohesion Policy 2014-2020, which will grant the network access to part of the Structural Funds of the City of Lisbon. The CLLD is a unique framework for the democratic distribution of public funds: it foresees the management of the funding to be shared between administration, private and civic partners, with none of them having the majority of shares and votes.
While, as the previous cases demonstrate, the public sector plays an important role in strengthening civil society in some European cities, many others witnessed the emergence of new welfare services provided by the civic economy completely outside or without any help by the public sector. In some occasions, community contribution appears in the form of philanthropist donation to support the construction, renovation or acquisition of playgrounds, parks, stores, pubs or community spaces. In others, community members act as creditors or investors in an initiative that needs capital, in exchange for interest, shares or the community ownership of local assets, for instance, shops in economically challenged neighbourhoods. Crowdfunding platforms also help coordinating these processes: the French Bulb in Town platform, specialized in community investment, gathered over 1 million euros for the construction of a small hydroelectric plant in Ariège that brings investors a return of 7% per year.
ExRotaprint, Berlin. Photo (cc) Eutropian
Besides aggregating resources from individuals to support particular cases, community infrastructure projects are also helped by ethical investors. When two artists mobilised their fellow tenants to save the listed 10.000 m2 Rotaprint in the Berlin district of Wedding, they invited several organisations working on moving properties off the speculation market and eliminating the debts attached to land, to help them buy the buildings. While the complex was bought and is renovated with the help of an affordable loan by the CoOpera pension fund, the land was bought by the Edith Maryon and Trias Foundations and is rented (with a long-term lease, a “heritable building right”) to ExRotaprint, a non-profit company, making it impossible to resell the shared property. With its sustainable cooperative ownership model, ExRotaprint provides affordable working space for manufacturers as well as social and cultural initiatives whose rents cover the loans and the land’s rental fee.
Creating community ownership over local assets and keeping profits benefit local residents and services is a crucial component of resilient neighbourhoods. Challenging the concept of value and money, many local communities began to experiment with complementary currencies like the Brixton or Bristol Pounds. Specific organisational forms like Community Land Trusts or cooperatives have been instrumental in helping residents create inclusive economic ecosystems and sustainable development models.
Homebaked, Liverpool. Photo (cc) Eutropian
In Liverpool’s Anfield neighbourhood, a community bakery is the symbol of economic empowerment: renovated and run by the Homebaked Community Land Trust established in April 2012, the bakery – initially backed by the Liverpool Biennale – offers employment opportunities for locals, and it is the catalyst of local commerce and the centre of an affordable housing project that is developed in the adjacent parcels. Similarly, a few kilometres east, local residents established another CLT to save the Toxteth neighborhood from demolition. The Granby Four Streets Community Land Trust, with the help of social investors and a young collective of architects (winning the prestigious Turner prize), organised a scheme that includes affordable housing, community-run public facilities and shops.
The economic self-determination of a community has been explored at the scale of an entire neighbourhood by the Afrikaanderwijk Cooperative in Southern Rotterdam. The cooperative is an umbrella organisation that connects workspaces with shopkeepers, local makers, social foundations, and the local food market: they have developed an energy collective in cooperation with an energy supplier that realises substantial savings for businesses in the neighbourhood; a cleaning service that ensures that cleaning work is commissioned locally; and a food delivery service for elderly people in the neighbourhood.
With community organisations and City Makers acquiring significant skills to manage welfare services, urban infrastructures and inclusive urban development processes, it is time for their recognition by established actors in the public and private sectors. The EU’s Urban Agenda, developing guidelines for a more sustainable and inclusive development of European cities, can be a catalyst of this recognition: it can prompt the creation of new instruments and policies to enable such community-led initiatives. While the Cohesion Policy 2014-2020 has developed the CLLD framework, not many Member States chose to use this instrument. The Urban Agenda could therefore envision the adoption of more methods to be experimented by City Administrations, to allow for a more sustainable and inclusive allocation of resources. Whether through matchfunding, grant systems, or simply removing the legal barriers of cooperatives, land trusts and community investment, municipalities could join the civil society in developing a more resilient civic economy with accessible jobs, affordable housing, clean energy, and social integration.
Lead image from homebaked.org, Liverpool UK. All other images from Eutropian.
The post Community Capital in Action: New Financial Models for Resilient Cities appeared first on P2P Foundation.
]]>The post Celebrating the Future at Bristol’s New Economy Summit appeared first on P2P Foundation.
]]>Jules Peck reports from Bristols’ recent New Economy Summit.
The event drew 180 people from Bristol, the UK and places as far flung as Brazil, Spain, Greece, Chile, Thailand, Germany and S Africa. The diversity of people made the event a powerful mix of ideas and practice, with attendees from the worlds of social enterprise, business, local and regional government, academia, think tanks, social movements, faiths, finance, higher education, healthcare and philanthropy.
The aim of the event was to explore and celebrate the explosion of new economy experiments that are surfacing all around the world in response to the great challenges of our times, poverty, environmental meltdown and systemic failures in everything from finance to trust.
We also wanted to showcase and celebrate practical examples of the way Bristol city bioregion – home to initiatives like Happy City, Bristol Pounds, Bristol Prospects, Real Economy Cooperative, Transition Bristol, the Real Economy Lab – is responding to these challenges with new economy innovations.
A stellar line-up of speakers over the two days included; Michel Bauwens of the P2P Foundation, James Berry from Bristol Credit Union, Fran Boait of Positive Money, Bristol’s Mayor George Ferguson, Tony Greenham of the RSA, Catherine Howarth from ShareAction, Diego La Moneda from Economy for the Common Good, Constance Laisné of Altgen Youth Coop, Ed Mayo from Cooperatives UK, Amanda Feldman from B Lab UK, Ciaran Mundy of The Bristol Pound, Dan O’Neill from University of Leeds, Jules Peck from the Real Economy Lab, Kate Raworth of Doughnut Eonomics, Molly Scott Cato MEP, John Thackara of Doors of Perception, Sarah Toy from Bristol city Council, and Liz Zeidler from Happy City.
You can explore the event as it unfolded yourselves through photos and tweets on the event’s storify.
To kick off we explored ‘doughnut economics’ – how we can find a safe space for human wellbeing on our highly threatened one planet and how the ‘eclipsing of capitalism’ which Jeremy Rifkin and Paul Mason have recently described, and growing band of next economy movements and experiments is responding to these challenges.
It was clear during the two days that Bristol is very much a beating heart of UK (if not global) innovation on these issues. So it was fitting that in his slot Bristol’s Mayor George Ferguson, who has long been a strong champion for all things new economy, threw down a gauntlet and invitation to us all to use Bristol as a laboratory for experimentation and innovation on next economy thinking and practice. I expect many of us will hold him to his promise to support Bristol staying at the cutting edge of these issues.
One thing that was very clear throughout is that Thatcher was wrong – there are alternatives, they are all around us if we just tune into them. We heard from leading thinkers and practitioners from across the worlds of new economy ownership, finance, enterprise models, the future of cities and their bioregions. We explored what a new p2p ‘commons’ ownership world might look like and heard about the hundreds of enterprise models around the world already working in a p2p, collaborative and commons orientated way. A host of other issues were surfaced and debated including things like citizens incomes, alternative currencies, interest free money, credit unions, community land trusts, open-cooperatives, the Chamber of the Commons and much much more.
Diego De La Moneda described what a new Economy for the Common Good might look like for businesses and local government and how hundreds of companies and a network of Cities from Santiago in Chile to Barcelona, London (and soon hopefully Bristol) are putting the Economy for the Common Good vision into practice in a Global Hub for the Common Good.
Breaking with traditional ‘listen and learn’ style conference formats, the summit used ‘open-space’ social technology and discourse sessions throughout, and was focused on everyone sharing their thoughts and plans and collaborating in break-out groups and feed-back sessions to look for ways we could all work together for the common good. And this wasn’t just about talking – by the end of the two days there were long lists of new initiatives people had hatched up over the event.
One of many highlights of the event for me was hearing Sarah Toy from Bristol City Council talking about her vision for what the City can do and indeed is doing to put Bristol in the vanguard of sustainable, liveable and new economy cities. With Bristol being this year’s EU Green Capital and being one of the $100m Rockefeller Foundation’s 100 Resilient Cities initiative, I’m hoping Bristol can help show other city-bioregions leadership and inspiration in modelling what a city for the Common Good can look and feel like.
Judging by the energy in the room over the two days, feedback from attendees and the amount of twitter activity, I think its fair to say the audience enjoyed the event as much as we hosts did. To be honest the only worrying thing about the event was the number of people who are now asking us to repeat the summit on a regular basis……..
Jules peck is convenor of the Real Economy Lab, which is building an open-space, open-access platform to act as hub to support the coming together of a global movement of movements on all things ‘next economy’. His co-hosts at the summit were Angela Raffle, Simone Osborn, Peter Lipman, Dave Hunter and Ciaran Mundy. Thanks to Mark Simmons for the photography
The post Celebrating the Future at Bristol’s New Economy Summit appeared first on P2P Foundation.
]]>