Spain is Ground Zero for the P2P Revolution

Within Spain, the organization of these camps is striking: they work like small kibbutzim where everybody shares what they have and where the decisions are adopted by consensual agreement. Their posters carry slogans as imaginative as those from May ‘68 in Paris: “Our dreams are too big for their polls”, “I think, therefore I disturb”, “No house, no job, no retirement, no fear”, “Take the street”, “Read more”, “I am not against the system, the system is against me”, “Your booty, my crack” (Botín, the family name of the owner of the Santander Bank, the biggest Spanish bank and one of the biggest all over the world, means ‘booty’ in Spanish). Reading the slogans, you will find few complaints lodged about particular political leaders as one might have expected. Instead, people are focused on the lack of participation in decision-making processes and market tyranny over the entire political class. These protesters are by no means apolitical: they like to refer to themselves as ‘superpolitical’. – Pedro Moreno

When people agree on what they don’t want, i.e. a market dictatorship in the hands of a financial predatory class, but are open-minded about the future, what should they ask for?

The answer is very simply: true democracy, as this leaves all options open to create ‘other worlds’.

This is why the relative indeterminacy of the Spanish movement is not a bug, but a feature. It signals civil society forces have found a format for their protests, and a unifying platform, and this is why what happened in Spain is really Ground Zero for the start of a process towards deep transformation of our civilisation and political economy. It’s early days, just green shoots, and the new generations have to be politically schooled as they face obstacles and repression, but, the tipping point has been reached, and something new has blossomed in the world.

See also this Anonymous Call for a Global P2P Revolution, to be organized on 11.11.11.

Here some further analysis from various sources. Don’t miss the video interview of Democracy Now at the bottom of this article.

1.

Pablo Ouziel:

“Spain is finally re-embracing its radical past, its popular movements, its anarcho-syndicalist traditions and its republican dreams. Crushed by Generalissimo Francisco Franco seventy years ago, it seemed that Spanish popular culture would never recover from the void left by a rightwing dictatorship, which exterminated anyone with a dissenting voice; but the 15th of May 2011, is the reminder to those in power that Spanish direct democracy is still alive and has finally awaken.

In the 1970’s a transition through pact, transformed Spain’s totalitarian structures into a representative democracy in which all the economic structures remained intact. For the highly illiterate generations of the time, marred in the reality of a poverty-stricken country, the concessions made by the country’s elite seemed something worth celebrating. Nevertheless, as the decades passed, the state-owned corporations were privatized robbing the nation of its collective wealth, and the political scene crystallized into a pseudo-democracy in which two large parties PP and PSOE marginalized truly democratic alternatives. As this neoliberal political project materialized, the discontent begun to resurface, but the fear mongers, Spain’s baby-boomers who had once fought for democracy, were quick to remind the youth of the dangers of rebellion. For many decades in Spain, the mantra was, ‘it is better to live as we are than to go back to the totalitarianism of the past, and if you shake the system too much, it will take away our hard-earned rights’. So the youth remained silent, fearful of what could happen if they spoke, and the baby-boomers in their content blamed the youth for their indifference. According to them, it was the youth unwilling to work, which were bringing the country to its knees. But the youth have stopped this blame game, and aware of the true risks to their future are finally enticing the whole country to mobilize.

A failed European project, with its borders quickly being reinstated, a collapsing Euro currency, and the examples of Greece, Portugal and Ireland are the reminders to those on the streets of what it is they are fighting to disassociate themselves from, and of the freedoms they are working towards. The economic and political project of the country’s elite has destroyed the economic dreams of whole generations of naïve and apathetic Spaniards; it has left the country in the hands of bond speculators and central bankers, and Spaniards will have to pay that price. Nevertheless, the debt accumulated by the Spanish family, has also earned it the education with which it can understand what is going on, and through it Spanish people will liberate themselves from the tyranny of their government.

What has begun in Madrid’s Puerta del Sol and has been echoed in fifty-two cities across the country is the crystallization of a popular movement for freedom, which has no intention of fading away. The people have no choice, either they take city squares as symbols of their struggle, or their message is never heard. The government knows this and that is why it has quickly responded by trying to disperse the crowds with its repressive police force, but following some arrests, the people are back with more strength.

A silent revolution has begun in Spain, a nonviolent revolution which seeks democracy through democratic means, justice through just means, and peace through peaceful means has finally captivated the imagination of the Spanish people, and now there is no turning back. The challenge ahead will be in keeping the collective spirit nonviolent as the police force does everything in its power to disintegrate the movement into a violent chaos that can justify its repression. The popular movement will also have to be alert as the bond speculators threaten the country with economic sanctions in order to scare the population into submission, and a constructive program will have to be articulated so that the movement can continue to function whilst providing sustainable alternatives for a different Spain.

Hopefully an articulate steering committee will flourish soon from amongst the crowds, which is capable of making clear and viable demands that grab the imagination of the country and force the political elite to comply. These are delicate times in Spain, if this spontaneous nonviolent movement succeeds, Spain may welcome a brighter future, if it fails, I fear violence will become the only option for those in pain. What those outside of the country can do for Spain is to echo the shouts of indignation coming from the country’s streets. So far both mainstream and progressive international media channels have opted for silence. Let us hope this silence breaks. “

2.

Pedro Silverio Moreno focuses on how the movement was rooted in campaigns against internet repression:

“On February 15, PSOE, PP and CiU all agreed to pass a law on the use of the internet which went against the interests of the majority of the people, initially nobody said boo. Once the law was passed however, the social networks began to buzz. An account published in the Wikileaks papers of how this law was passed, told of the US Embassy working with the Spanish Culture Minister during the previous month to seal the deal. One controversial aspect of the new law in particular came to light, allowing any website to be shut down without any room for judicial supervision if an anonymous complaint claimed that it had no right to the information posted on its pages. On twitter, there emerged the most significant response – #nolesvotes (do not vote for them) – bearing a message for those about to vote in the local elections on May 22, ‘Do not vote for any of these three main parties.’ According to the results of the local and regional polls conducted this Sunday, these parties have lost 5.81 % points. Together they now command under 69 % of the votes. What has made the difference is the ‘SpanishRevolution’.

In the beginning, nobody, not the traditional media, nor the big parties thought that it was a significant event. On May 15, a demonstration was called for in the main Spanish cities under the slogan “Real democracy now!” By Sunday evening, the main Spanish squares were full of people shouting and calling for more democratic participation and more transparency in political decisions. Since then, they have occupied Puerta del Sol, the central square in Madrid, and a dangerous, democratic virus has begun to sweep through the rest of the country. By the following week-end, messages are coming in of hundreds of camps springing up much further afield.

Within Spain, the organization of these camps is striking: they work like small kibbutzim where everybody shares what they have and where the decisions are adopted by consensual agreement. Their posters carry slogans as imaginative as those from May ‘68 in Paris: “Our dreams are too big for their polls”, “I think, therefore I disturb”, “No house, no job, no retirement, no fear”, “Take the street”, “Read more”, “I am not against the system, the system is against me”, “Your booty, my crack” (Botín, the family name of the owner of the Santander Bank, the biggest Spanish bank and one of the biggest all over the world, means ‘booty’ in Spanish). Reading the slogans, you will find few complaints lodged about particular political leaders as one might have expected. Instead, people are focused on the lack of participation in decision-making processes and market tyranny over the entire political class. These protesters are by no means apolitical: they like to refer to themselves as ‘superpolitical’. The call that went out to people voting on Sunday was against abstention, explaining the differences between blank votes and null votes. Fortunately, participation in the elections has risen: an estimated 65 percent of the nation’s 34 million eligible voters cast their votes in Sunday’s polls.

From their first moments, life in these camps, in Madrid and everywhere else, has proved to be totally resistant to violence. In the run-up to Spain’s local elections every candidate was suddenly scared of this movement: the socialists, because they knew that most of the people settled in the camps are socialist voters who are disillusioned with them; the conservatives, because they remember the demo before the March 11 attacks in front of their headquarters when they lost power. Spain’s Electoral Central Board tried to rule that the gathering should not continue into this weekend, arguing that the protest could unduly influence the voters. But the deadline has come and gone. Government said that if there was no incident, the police must let the people stay in the squares. The camps celebrated the decision, and now they have decided to stay for another week at least. “

Watch this video from Democracy Now, which includes interviews with organizers of the M15 movement:

11 Comments Spain is Ground Zero for the P2P Revolution

  1. AvatarNingúnOtro

    You haven’t seen anything yet Michel.

    Though bringing together enormous amounts of people with different skill and conscience levels to reach minimal consensus is in itself a daunting task… those who thought they had made it thoroughly impossible and thus secured their exclusivity to power and wealth… will soon discover there is nothing to stop an idea whose time has come.

  2. AvatarMichel Bauwens

    Ironically, the very refusal to reform the diseased system after 2008, due to the sense of invulnerability of the elite, is also the precondition for the coming explosion …; “they” basically ruled out the softer options for change … and by taking too much away, force even the doubters into the camp of resistance

  3. AvatarFrancisco

    I live next to the movement 15M. The article is well written and corresponds with reality.

  4. AvatarNingúnOtro

    Do not delude yourself into thinking the wrong things or spreading the wrong ideas, Michel. There is no sense of invulnerability in the elite, nor do they refuse to amend the “deceased system”.

    This is a game-theory setup with multiple “non-cooperative” elite players, some of them wanting -but not getting near yet- the NWO super-solution, and myriads of non-elite players.

    Not even the biggest of elite players, not even the NWO Consortium, can have all it wants his way without extreme effort.

    As soon as the non-elite players figure out a doable plan to sidetrack the elites, mighty as they appear now, they are history.

    That is what all elites are also well aware of… and not necessarily too many non-elite players.

    The actual movements have no plan, thus no future, and will be throttled to get as much steam out of the kettle harmlessly.

    Unless they awake and stop asking things that are only possible in a nirvana they are far from reaching yet.

    One can not dream of a perfect world without greed and abuse… and get there only using the tools that would be normal in such a world. Societies without defenses can only survive in plastic bubbles as long as viral contamination exists. If those that would like to live in them discard the use of antivirals as being not in their nature… they will never make their way into creating that virusless world… because virae (even merely intellectual ones) have to be rooted out ACTIVELY. You can not dream them away.

  5. AvatarMichel Bauwens

    Well, not sure what the ‘wrong story’ that I’m peddling is, since I agree with your comments? The spanish and other mobilizations should not be seen as fully formed, they are merely the first stage of a new cycle of struggle and mobilization that will be based on a new set of political values. And in some ways, they have truly radical premises. The Arab uprisings were about democracy, but in practice, ‘our democracy’, which as we know, is not a real democracy. Hence the demand for ‘real democracy’ is truly radical and revolutionary. Of course, a lot is still lacking in the movement, and as long as they do not tackle power directly, it won’t be able to affect change. But what is important is that the new generation is mobilizing on their own terms, and starting to go through their own educational processes, of what politics and social change are about. For that, they need demands that really ‘hurt’ the other side, and we’re not there yet.

  6. AvatarNingúnOtro

    My second comment only reacts to your saying “due to the sense of invulnerability of the elite” and does not involve the rest of the article.

    It is wrong to make people think the elites are a monolitic bloc with only one aim and perfect cohesion among them.

    There exists an certain logic they can no longer escape once they start living by it and thus become elite… but the elite also is a hierarchy of wolves that compete among each other for the upper places of the pyramid.

    The phase we actually entered when the subprime bubble busted is one of damage control and search of substitute growth vectors.

    As suboptimally exploited natural resources not yet under control of some elite are becoming scarce and costly to acquire control of, the elites increase the wealth transfer from their “sheeple” because that is still easier to achieve than forcefully dispute assets between different elites.

    Outright war is only practical when the expected increased control of additional resources outweights the cost of waging it… thus there is a certain ongoing competition between competing top elites to “bring democracy” to non-elite (or weak elite) controlled territories. In the case of the arab countries what we witness is the change of clientelar dictatorial sub-elites whose allegiance is being doubted of to “true democratic regimes” whose allegiance can not be doubted.

    They are being donated the type of “democracy” the elites like… and it happens to be also the type of “democracy” we can not stand anymore in the west and are trying to get rid of.

    Makes me laugh when both movements are mentioned in one single sentence 😉 . It only increases the FUD and hinders the clear sight towards a real solution (the one the #XRevolution movements can’t seem to find and thus warrants their uselessness).

  7. AvatarFrancisco

    Muy interesantes estos comentarios. Se me ocurre, Ningún Otro, que según yo lo veo los jugadores de élite, sea cual sea su relativa posición en la pirámide, tienen siempre al fin y al cabo, un plato de comida caliente en su mesa, mientras que los jugadores de no-élite, pues no siempre. Esto cualquier teoría de juegos te lo contempla… ¿O no?

    Opino que hay una “masa crítica” del horror por debajo de la cual ya no debiéramos jugar a saber de teoría de juegos: deberíamos ser humanos responsables y con algún sentimiento de reciprocidad, de compasión humana.

    Gracias por leerme. Un saludo.

  8. AvatarGure

    @Ningúnotro, the moment we are calling events in the Arab world revolutions (cause they clearly are) and we are calling what is happening in Spain revolution (regardless of whether it is an actual revolution yet or not) you can use them in the same sentence. That you feel the need to separate them is a different story (“makes me laugh”).

    Regarding “In the case of the arab countries what we witness is the change of clientelar dictatorial sub-elites whose allegiance is being doubted of to “true democratic regimes” whose allegiance can not be doubted” – Would you mind expanding please? I am not sure I am understanding.. Are you saying that true democratic (true at least in terms of proper elections) Arab regimes will no doubt bend (“whose allegiance cannot be doubted”) to what you call top elites (western govs?).

    Nobody is donating (your word) anything in the Middle East, if anything Arabs are trying to achieve what has been called democracy over here up until two weeks ago because it has been the paradigm (and, realistically, still is) all along. When you expand, do you mind mentioning how much knowledge (direct or academic or casual/random) of the Middle East and/or current events over there you have? Thanks!

  9. AvatarMichel Bauwens

    I don’t speak myself of the ‘spanish revolution’ but of a moment in the “p2p revolution”. The reason is that the spanish mobilizations do not in any way yet directly challenge power. But why are they important nevertheless. To my mind because they are the first effective mass mobilisation by the new culture, on its own terms. Thus, I see it as a tipping point, the ball is now rolling, but all of us will have to learn a lot before becoming effective at actual change. But what has changed, I think with no way back, is the birth of a new subjectivity. This new generation has changed ‘inside’ and ‘for’ themselves, clearly planting a flag and announcing the new world. In a way, despite its still relative “lame” appearance, it’s actually already more radical than what happened in the Middle East. The unity of the movement there is around removing dictators and establishing democracy, but the type of democracy that is familiar to us, and we know what kind of weak and inconsequent democracy that is. By demanding “real democracy” therefore, they are demanding something new and much more radical.

  10. Pingback: España: Zona cero de la Revolución P2P

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.