Refuting the ideological warfare used to justify the invasion of Greece

First, thanks for reading this important quote, which doesn’t require absolutizing national sovereignty to see its essential truth:

What is going on in Athens at the moment is resistance against an invasion — and this invasion is being justified with the extensive use of mythology. What is going on in Athens at the moment is resistance against an invasion; an invasion as brutal as that against Poland in 1939. The invading army wears suits instead of uniforms and holds laptops instead of guns, but make no mistake – the attack on our sovereignty is as violent and thorough. Private wealth interests are dictating policy to a sovereign nation, which is expressly and directly against its national interest. Ignore it at your peril. Say to yourselves, if you wish, that perhaps it will stop there. That perhaps the bailiffs will not go after the Portugal and Ireland next. And then Spain and the UK. But it is already beginning to happen. This is why you cannot afford to ignore these events.

In order to justify the global financial takeover of Greece, according to author Alex Andreou, extensive ideological warfare is being waged through the corporate media, around certain themes which are refuted below:

* Greeks are lazy.

This underlies much of what is said and written about the crisis, the implication presumably being that our lax Mediterranean work-ethic is at the heart of our self-inflicted downfall. And yet, OECD data among its members show that in 2008, Greeks worked on average 2120 hours a year. That is 690 hours more than the average German, 467 more than the average Brit and 356 more than the OECD average. Only Koreans work longer hours. Further, the paid leave entitlement in Greece is on average 23 days, lower than most EU countries including the UK’s minimum 28 and Germany’s whopping 30.

* Greeks retire early.

The figure of 53 years old as an average retirement age is being bandied about. So much, in fact, that it is being seen as fact. The figure actually originates from a lazy comment on the NY Times website. It was then repeated by Fox News and printed on other publications. Greek civil servants have the option to retire after 17.5 years of service, but this is on half benefits. The figure of 53 is a misinformed conflation of the number of people who choose to do this (in most cases to go on to different careers) and those who stay in public service until their full entitlement becomes available. Looking at Eurostat’s data from 2005 the average age of exit from the labour force in Greece (indicated in the graph below as EL for Ellas) was 61.7; higher than Germany, France or Italy and higher than the EU27 average. Since then Greece have had to raise the minimum age of retirement twice under bail-out conditions and so this figure is likely to rise further.

* Greece is a weak economy that should never have been a part of the EU.

One of the assertions frequently levelled at Greece is that its membership to the European Union was granted on emotional “cradle of democracy” grounds. This could not be further from the truth. Greece became the first associate member of the EEC outside the bloc of six founding members (Germany, France, Italy and the Benelux countries) in 1962, much before the UK. It has been a member of the EU for 30 years. It is classified by the World Bank as a “high income economy” and in 2005 boasted the 22nd highest human development and quality of life index in the world – higher than the UK, Germany or France. As late as 2009 it had the 24th highest per capita GDP according to the World Bank. Moreover, according to the University of Pennsylvania’s Centre for International Comparisons, Greece’s productivity in terms of real GDP per person per hour worked, is higher than that of France, Germany or the US and more than 20% higher than the UK’s.

* The first bail-out was designed to help Greek people, but unfortunately failed.

It was not. The first bail-out was designed to stabilise and buy time for the Eurozone. It was designed to avoid another Lehman-Bros-type market shock, at a time when financial institutions were too weak to withstand it. In the words of BBC economist Stephanie Flanders: “Put it another way: Greece looks less able to repay than it did a year ago – while the system as a whole looks in better shape to withstand a default… From their perspective, buying time has worked for the eurozone. It just hasn’t been working out so well for Greece.” If the bail-out were designed to help Greece get out of debt, then France and Germany would not have insisted on future multi-billion military contracts. As Daniel Cohn-Bendit, the MEP and leader of the Green group in the European Parliament, explained: “In the past three months we have forced Greece to confirm several billion dollars in arms contracts. French frigates that the Greeks will have to buy for 2.5 billion euros. Helicopters, planes, German submarines.”

* The second bail-out is designed to help Greek people and will definitely succeed.

I watched as Merkel and Sarkozy made their joint statement yesterday. It was dotted with phrases like “Markets are worried”, “Investors need reassurance” and packed with the technical language of monetarism. It sounded like a set of engineers making minor adjustments to an unmanned probe about to be launched into space. It was utterly devoid of any sense that at the centre of what was being discussed was the proposed extent of misery, poverty, pain and even death that a sovereign European partner, an entire nation was to endure. In fact most commentators agree, that this second package is designed to do exactly what the first one did: buy more time for the banks, at considerable expense to the Greek people. There is no chance of Greece ever being able to repay its debt – default is inevitable. It is simply servicing interest and will continue to do so in perpetuity.

* And the biggest myth of them all: Greeks are protesting because they want the bail-out but not the austerity that goes with it.

This is a fundamental untruth. Greeks are protesting because they do not want the bail-out at all. They have already accepted cuts which would be unfathomable in the UK – think of what Cameron is doing and multiply it by ten. Benefits have not been paid in over six months. Basic salaries have been cut to 550 Euros (£440) a month.”

Alex concludes with this important appeal to all us:

“Finally, we have woken up and taken to the streets. My sister tells me that what is happening in Syntagma Square is beautiful; filled with hope; gloriously democratic. A totally bi-partisan crowd of hundreds of thousands of people have occupied the area in front of our Parliament. They share what little food and drink there is. A microphone stands in the middle, on which anyone can speak for two minutes at a time – even propose things which are voted by a show of thumbs. Citizenship.

And what they say is this: We will not suffer any more so that we can make the rich, even richer. We do not authorise any of the politicians, who failed so spectacularly, to borrow any more money in our name. We do not trust you or the people that are lending it. We want a completely new set of accountable people at the helm, untainted by the fiascos of the past. You have run out of ideas.

Wherever in the world you are, their statement applies.

Money is a commodity, invented to help people by facilitating transactions. It is not wealth in itself. Wealth is natural resources, water, food, land, education, skill, spirit, ingenuity, art. In those terms, the people of Greece are no poorer than they were two years ago. Neither are the people of Spain or Ireland or the UK. And yet, we are all being put through various levels of suffering, in order for numbers (representing money which never existed) to be transferred from one column of a spreadsheet to another.

This is why the matter concerns you directly. Because this is a battle between our right to self-determine, to demand a new political process, to be sovereign, and private corporate interests which appear determined to treat us like a herd, which only exists for their benefit. It is the battle against a system which ensures that those who f.ck up, are never those that are punished – it is always the poorest, the most decent, the most hard-working that bear the brunt. The Greeks have said “Enough is enough”. What do you say?”

8 Comments Refuting the ideological warfare used to justify the invasion of Greece

  1. Pingback: josef’s Blog

  2. AvatarAlex Dimitrakopoulos

    Well said, except for one point. The Greek civilians all these years have silently accepted the system ( political parties and members of parliament ) to manipulate morals , ethics and even the law itself in an exchange for a better and easier life (
    working preferably for the government). Two people to do the job of one has been the system in Greece for the past 30 or so years, simply because thats how politicians at rule would buy their votes. It’s not how many hours one works but how productive one is. How can Greece be productive when there is no competition? How can one improve if he does not feel pressure. The entire system needs structural reforming starting with the political system and the punishment of those who live off it like parasitically.

  3. AvatarStephanie

    As revealed by Strauss Khan, former head of the IMF, Prime Papandreou had been plotting for some time to bring Greece under the yoke of the IMF. Papandreou already knew before the elections of 2009 that the country was in deep trouble financially. Yet in his pre-election speeches he purposefully lied to the Greek people, telling the electorate that “there is plenty of money”. Having won a comfortable majority, he then proceeded to sign up the country for huge loans that it has no hopes of repaying and has pledged the entirety of the Greek public wealth as collateral. This means that unless Greece can keep up repayments as they fall due, which many economists say is highly unlikely given the dire state of its economy, its creditors will be able to grab ever more state assets.

    The monstrous loan agreement by which the country was effectively turned into an economic protectorate of its creditors was never ratified in parliament, having been signed only by the Greek FinMin and the governor of the Bank of Greece (a private bank), with many MPs remaining ignorant of its terms until the first tranche of the loan had been disbursed. The scandal has been systematically covered up by the media and the press, both in Greece and abroad.

    It has now been announced that there will be a vote in parliament by the end of June to officially make this preposterous “loan agreement” law of the state. The date, which has yet to be confirmed, was chosen on purpose, as this is the time when Greek people traditionally escape to the beach in search of relief from the scorching heat of the Greek summer.

  4. Avatarnoulo

    Hi Michel!

    My Maths skills are not great, but how is it possible for Greeks to work more hours than Germans or Brits (as you say) and produce more per person per hour (as you say) and still have a lower GDP per capita in comparison to these countries?

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.