Net neutrality is too regulatory — but Stop Online Piracy isn’t?

Several Republicans in the U.S. Congress who voted this year to overturn Net neutrality rules — with most opponents arguing the rules would create the first-ever regulation of the Internet — have now signed on to sponsor one of two bills that would allow the U.S. Department of Justice to seek court orders to shut down websites accused of infringing copyright.

Twenty-seven Republican lawmakers who opposed the U.S. Federal Communications Commission’s Net neutrality rules are sponsors of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in the U.S. House of Representatives or the Protect IP Act in the U.S. Senate. One of the main arguments against the Net neutrality rules is they bring unneeded regulation to the Internet that could slow innovation and broadband deployment.

[ Also on InfoWorld: Business Software Alliance withdraws support for Stop Online Piracy Act. | Also check out FAQ: What the SOPA soap opera is all about. | Stay ahead of the key tech business news with InfoWorld’s Today’s Headlines: First Look newsletter. | Read Bill Snyder’s Tech’s Bottom Line blog for what the key business trends mean to you. ]

No Democratic sponsors of SOPA or Protect IP voted against the Net neutrality rules.

The goal of both SOPA and Protect IP is to shut down so-called rogue websites selling pirated music and movies or counterfeit products such as clothing and medicine. While Protect IP has been controversial, debate has been more heated over the more expansive SOPA, which would allow the DOJ to target websites accusing of “enabling or facilitating” copyright infringement.

Opponents of SOPA, including Public Knowledge, Google and the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA), have argued the bill would allow copyright holders to seek court orders targeting legitimate websites that feature user-generated content. The bill would allow the DOJ to seek court orders requiring domain name registrars and ISPs to block U.S. access to sites accused of infringing copyright, and critics have suggested that Web users’ efforts to circumvent those blocks will lead to security problems.

Eleven House Republicans who voted in April to overturn the FCC’s Net neutrality rules are cosponsors of the SOPA, which would allow the DOJ to also seek court orders forcing online advertising networks, payment processors, and search engines to stop doing business with or linking to foreign websites accused of enabling or facilitating copyright infringement. The bill would also allow copyright holders to seek court orders in some cases.

Prominent Republicans who opposed Net neutrality but sponsored SOPA include Representatives Lamar Smith of Texas, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee; Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, one of the leading critics of Net neutrality rules; and Bob Goodlatte of Virginia. Goodlatte has called for some changes to SOPA and has said he’s willing to work with critics of the legislation on their concerns.

Source: http://www.infoworld.com/d/the-industry-standard/net-neutrality-too-regulatory-stop-online-piracy-isnt-179832

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.