Comments on: Markets Before and After Capitalism https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/markets-before-capitalism/2016/02/11 Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:20:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.15 By: Jean-Pierre https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/markets-before-capitalism/2016/02/11/comment-page-1#comment-1589162 Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:20:52 +0000 http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/?p=53891#comment-1589162 See : R. H. Coase, The nature of the firm, 1937, at p. 388 “production could be carried on without any organisation at all” and also “it is possible to have a private enterprise system without the existence of firm” (n. 1, p. 401) ;

See also S. N. S. Cheung : “In the broadest sense, all production and exchange activities not guided by the invisible hand of the market are organized activities. Thus, any arrangement that requires the use of a manager, a director, a superviser, a clerk, an enforcer, a lawyer, a judge, an agent, or even a middleman implies the presence of an organization. These professions would not exist in the Crusoe economy, and payments for their employment are transaction costs. When transaction costs are defined to include all costs not found in a Crusoe economy, and economic organizations are defined equally broadly to include any arrangement requiring the service of a visible hand, a corollary appears : all organization costs are transaction costs, and vice versa.’, The New Palgrave, A Dictionary of Economics, 1987, p. 56.

Note that “and vice versa” is very important !!!

A must read is Cheung’s paper ‘The contractual nature of the firm’, 1983. One of the best ever, with Coase’s of course. The master and the great pupil. Still alive…

]]>