Excerpted from an editorial by Mark Pesce, about unassailable network power:
“For you see, the network isn’t the wires, the towers, or the mobiles. The network is people. And people don’t like being spied upon. People will grow increasingly frustrated with the restrictions you place upon their activities, and from those frustrations will come a search for solutions.
As someone works something out – finds a hole in the filters, or a place outside the state’s surveillance – that knowledge will be passed around, at the speed of light, through the network. People now move as one – as if coordinated, but without any coordinator – and within minutes, a hole becomes the tunnel through which everyone makes their escape.
It will happen right underneath your feet. It will happen all around you. You will believe you have the problem firmly in hand, only to be reminded – in the clearest possible terms – that you control nothing at all, you hear nothing at all, and all the money and time spent watching everything has resulted only in making your opposition more invisible and more potent.
This is why the riots ‘came out of nowhere’. You were already listening, Mr Cameron, but people had the sense to move themselves and their conversations away from your eyes and ears. This will happen again and again, and each time it does, your opponents will become harder to recognise, and harder to thwart.
So lock it all down, drive them all underground. I want you to do this. I need you to do this, Mr Cameron, because until you lose this battle a hundred times you will not begin to understand that you have already lost the war.
People are no longer subject to the control of the state. People can move faster than the state, people can out-think the state, people can be everywhere the state is not. 2011 is the year that we figured this out, and even if you took every mobile in Britain and threw them into the English Channel, this would not change.
This is not a technology moment. This is a moment of sociology, of anthropology. We have learned a new way of sharing, which has given us new capabilities, and although technology helps us share, we would share even if we had nothing but our voices.
We will not unlearn this. We have learned it by watching one another. Parents learn it from their children. Children learn it from older children. Everyone learns it from the television. It’s pervasive, it’s perfectly natural, and it cannot be stopped.
So please, grab a stick, and stir the hornet’s nest. I dare you. More than anything else I want to see a ‘democratic’ government bloody itself against a process that is far more democratic than anything that it has ever had the capability to be.
Yes, it is chaotic and ugly and threatening. But it is also wonderful and smart and capable. You get both, and you can’t just do away with either one. This is who we are. It’s unclear if your government – or any government – can make its peace with that. But I think it’s time we tried.
So please, go out there, guns blazing, and wage war. The more you try to shut things down, the smarter people will become. You are evolution’s goad, Mr Cameron. Without you, we’d probably just sit around all day, watching videos on YouTube. You give us a reason. You make us want to be better.
Unless you completely crush it, disrupting a network tends to make it more resilient. Yes, the network might go down for a while, but when it comes back, it’s stronger than before.
That’s what you have to look forward to, Mr Cameron – you, and your successors at Number 10. You’re breeding a nation which can resist any coercion. Well done.”
I pray that he is correct! My greatest fear is that the technologies of repression (and maybe even worse, the technologies of opinion manipulation via media and advertising) will outpace the drive to openness, transparency… and sustainability.
And that a desperation born of inequality of wealth occurring concurrently with vital resource shortages (water and access to food especially) will produce populations willing to grudgingly accept oligarchical control in exchange for mere preservation of life at some minimal level.
Poverty, ignorance and fear have always been an oligarchies greatest asset…
Without new economic models we may well more resemble a colony of bacteria approaching the wall of the petri dish… when its incapability of changing its strategy confronts the limits of its world and the colony dies.
The global economic model is essentially identical to that colony of bacteria… consume and grow at an ever faster rate so it can consume ever more ever more rapidly.
That paradigm has to end…
(I’m no Luddite… but rather a technophile who understands that government, finance and money itself are technologies. And these technologies need attention. In a sense we’ve got to alter the DNA that has shaped these institutions before our global organism hits our planet’s resource wall.)