Comments on: It Is Not a Revolution, It Is a New Networked Renaissance

By: karel Maet

karel Maet — Sat, 01 Feb 2014 14:23:18 +0000

Indeed, revolution itselfs just breaks down the old structures, we must focus on new ways and the way those will grow and be able to keep growing or renewing! if not we’ll just make a void and old powers will fill it with ease and become stronger than ever (true history is a great teacher). We are evolving, breaking boundaries, creating conciousness, let’s not loose ourselves in reaction (hate), but focus on creation (love)! We are society! Now let us shape it by all means we have and leave it to the futures historybooks to call that a revolution.

By: Alain Ambrosi

Alain Ambrosi — Fri, 31 Jan 2014 19:32:47 +0000

You’re right Bernardo. And that responds to what the French philosopher Deleuze said”.Why not think that a new type of revolution is becoming posible ..? (.pourquoi ne pas penser qu’un nouveau type de révolution est en train de devenir possible..)

By: Fabio Cecin

Fabio Cecin — Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:41:42 +0000

I had the idea recently that we “need a new Renaissance,” and apparently we’re in one already. Nice.

The Renaissance wasn’t about changing the rules. It instead just blew people’s minds, and then in the aftermath of that a bunch of rule-changing happened.

Instead of holding really old world-views and within them keep rearranging the RuleChairs on the Titanic, we blow up the views and _then_ we look at the rules, we laugh at them, and we have a much easier time figuring out the new ones — IF we can still manage to call them “rules,” that is.