Comments on: The Evolution of Modes of Exchange in the Context of P2P Theory https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/evolution-modes-exchange-context-p2p-theory/2016/05/06 Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices Fri, 06 May 2016 20:36:59 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.15 By: Nathan https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/evolution-modes-exchange-context-p2p-theory/2016/05/06/comment-page-1#comment-1576710 Fri, 06 May 2016 20:36:59 +0000 https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/?p=55975#comment-1576710 Concerning Marx’s mistake of not reconizing the characteristics of the nomadic social order: I read an account of Maneul Castells’ first visit to Silicon Valley decades ago. He purportedly abandoned his Marxist stance on the realization that in a digital age, place ( the land) no longer held meaning.

]]>
By: Peter Malleau https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/evolution-modes-exchange-context-p2p-theory/2016/05/06/comment-page-1#comment-1576700 Fri, 06 May 2016 01:03:56 +0000 https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/?p=55975#comment-1576700 Micheal, yet again a well written smart sounding artificial How ever you are still stuck in circular thinking, by using economical incentives as a talking point to drive production you are apparently epiamnesiaticly influenced by Up from communism by John P Diggins, Were he describes {epiphenomena “superstructures”}. Where as ” behind which the real power being the (capitalist)economic base of Russian, Germain and American society AKA The wealthy. Who took the the bulk of economic incentives and use them to further their comfy potion by using it as a weapon to control production and create need. quite contrary to your derivative supposition of incentive to work harder.

]]>