In a series of fascinating case studies, Boyle explains why gene sequences, basic business ideas and pairs of musical notes are now owned, why jazz might be illegal if it were invented today, why most of 20th century culture is legally unavailable to us, and why today’s policies would probably have smothered the World Wide Web at its inception.
Via Joi Ito:
“Jamie Boyle, Duke Law School Professor, the Chairman of the Board of Creative Commons, good friend and one of most interesting and articulate scholars on copyright, free culture and the public domain has just released a new book called The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind.
You can download the whole book for free as well as buy it if you like. đ
I’m still only part of the way through, but it is classic Boyle and a joy to read and full of great thoughts.”
“For a set of reasons that I will explain later, âthe opposite of propertyâ is a concept that is much more important when we come to the world of ideas, information, expression, and invention. We want a lot of material to be in the public domain, material that can be spread without property rights. âThe general rule of law is, that the noblest of human productionsâknowledge, truths ascertained, conceptions, and ideasâbecome, after voluntary communication to others, free as the air to common use.â12 Our art, our culture, our science depend on this public domain every bit as much as they depend on intellectual property. The third goal of this book is to explore propertyâs outside, propertyâs various antonyms, and to show how we are undervaluing the public domain and the information commons at the very moment in history when we need them most. Academic articles and clever legal briefs cannot solve this problem alone.
Instead, I argue that precisely because we are in the information age, we need a movement â akin to the environmental movement â to preserve the public domain. The explosion of industrial technologies that threatened the environment also taught us to recognize its value. The explosion of information technologies has precipitated an intellectual land grab; it must also teach us about both the existence and the value of the public domain. This enlightenment does not happen by itself. The environmentalists helped us to see the world differently, to see that there was such a thing as âthe environmentâ rather than just my pond, your forest, his canal. We need to do the same thing in the information environment.
We have to âinventâ the public domain before we can save it. . . .“