Comments on: David Harvey on the need for a (p2p-less!) “co-revolutionary theory”

By: Bob Haugen

Bob Haugen — Mon, 20 Jan 2014 21:05:22 +0000

P.S. did you see this conversation between David Graeber and David Harvey?

If you didn’t, I don’t know if you have time, it’s long. But I was struck by the degree of mutual respect between the participants (at least in this conversation). And toward the end, it gets into the questions of scale. (So if you don’t have time for the whole thing, skip to 55+ minutes in.)

By: Bob Haugen

Bob Haugen — Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:13:22 +0000

Michel, I’ll be very interested. Please also speak to the capability to confront global (or at least widespread) problems.

By: Michel Bauwens

Michel Bauwens — Mon, 20 Jan 2014 04:49:50 +0000

In reply to Jon Husband. I will work on a paper showing that all seven aspects are included

By: Jon Husband

Jon Husband — Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:00:48 +0000

Might he say it’s “contained” in a, c, d and e .. and thus operant on the others ?

By: Bob Haugen

Bob Haugen — Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:09:03 +0000

Michel: just noticed that, while you mentioned this today in G+, your article and Harvey’s were both written in 2009. Probably worth revisiting from both people.

By: Bob Haugen

Bob Haugen — Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:06:21 +0000

“However, it is clear that he completely misses out on the potential of peer production, governance and property as new modality, nor does he see the social movements arising out of it.”

Michel, have you asked Harvey about this? Would be an interesting conversation.