A contribution from Eric Harris-Braun:
“The power and awesomeness of where we are now, the pure raw potential is massive and unprecedented, and is proven by the enormous amount of waste, of all kinds, that we are generating. This power and potential is real. The limits of peak oil, and the limited capacity of our biosphere to accept fossil carbon dioxide without massive climate change are real. Which hand should I face? And I’m sure there is also a third, and fourth hand that are also just as real. The problem with this phrasing of “facing reality” is that it is also built on the same dualistic, mechanical world-view that underlies the phrasing of collapse. The idea of a single reality out there, that I as an individual have to “face,” works because of how separated we have allowed ourselves to become from that very reality that we are supposed to face. It works because we have swallowed the idea of ourselves as isolated point subjects in someway outside of, and viewing a mechanically objective and “real” world.
But we are not passive observers of a single reality. The very place we have gotten to is because of a particular constructed view of what reality is. If we had constructed a different understanding of reality, one based not on the idea that we are separate from nature and have dominion over it, then we would not be in the same place we are now. We have built the reality of our political and social structures for ourselves. For sure we are embedded in a deeper reality not only of our construction, but the lion’s share of the reality we experience is the one we are willing to experience and we construct for ourselves.
So, I refuse to “face” the “reality” of “collapse”. Instead I promise to explore the reality I have built for myself so far, and try to see how it is inaccurate and does not match my actual experience, so that I can change it and I can then build new realities that are more accurate to my experience in which I and my fellow journeyers are more empowered, more alive, and that creates greater possibility. For you see, we usually think about language as a tool that we use to describe reality, but language also creates the reality we experience. What makes makes our situation different from caterpillar/butterfly is that for us a butterfly is not a certain outcome. Our outcome is completely unknown. To me this means that our deepest responsibility is to envision a reality we want, and then do our best to build it; not in terms of how the current order is destined to fall apart, but in terms of how we want to take what life has miraculously made available to us now (our caterpillar body’s goo if you will) and what even more miraculous and precious we can build out of it.”
Do we “build” “realities”? Or discover them, as revealed. The practical value of seeing it as the latter is that sensitivity is rewarded., which is the prime requirement for envisioning something “miraculous”.
Absolutely right. We must have a vision of what can be and then we can see what is required to move us in its direction. We can be realistic utopians. The question is how can we do it together.