Date archives "March 2008"

Smári McCarthy on some issues with Open Hardware Licenses

Do we need Open Hardware Licenses for Open Source Physical Objects, and under what conditions? Smári McCarthy: “The problem with Open Source licenses on physical objects is that even though they might do the trick in a legal context, it isn’t what they’re designed to do, so the wording is all wrong. It’s like selling… Continue reading

Eric Harris-Braun on Acknowledging Ethical Value

This should be read as an update to Adam’s essay on the valuation of the esteem economy, which we published in excerpts in the last four days. Here, open money advocate Eric Harris-Braun makes a number of valuable distinctions, equating ethical contributions with ‘acknowledge wealth’. 1. The Wealth Typology “Wealth is access to well-being. There… Continue reading

Adam Arvidsson: Value in Ethical Economy. Conclusions on Money and Esteem

Adam concludes his essay in this last part: “However the socialization of ICTs and common standards will make them easily convertible. As Paul Hartzog imagines the scenario in his ‘The future of money’ : So, here’s a scenario for the future. You go to a rock concert, and you’ve never seen the opening band before…. Continue reading

Stefan Meretz: outcompeting private property?

Stefan Meretz made an interesting intervention at the German Keimform blog, part of a dialogue about the importance of the different forms of property. Stefan Meretz: “lets turn to the (most) interesting question of transformation. What shapes will the coming conflicts have, when peer production challenges capitalism within the physical sphere? What happens then with… Continue reading

Adam Arvidsson: Value in Ethical Economy. Part Three: Can there be currencies of esteem?

Part three of the landmark essay by Adam Arvidsson, first published at IDC. Go the IDC version for the references. Adam: Traditional systems of honor and esteem have worked in close-knit communities. Scaling them towards the contemporary information economy will necessarily entail making esteem transferable between different communities with different value standards. What is needed… Continue reading

Adam Arvidsson: Value in Ethical Economy. Part Two: The Valuation of Esteem

Part two of a draft essay by Adam Arvidsson that was first published at IDC. Go that version for the references. Adam: “Brands have a double nature. On the one hand they are commodities, objects with certain monetary values that are traded (mainly) on financial markets. On the other hand they are a form of… Continue reading

New Mobilities: Ce-more about what’s happening in the mobile world: Are we shifting towards a psycho–civilised society?

Internet journal First Monday has just published a new paper by Kingsley Dennis that takes a look at the possible detrimental effects of wireless technologies; especially how they might affect neuronal functions – in military, industrial, and social terms. New Mobilities: Ce-more about what’s happening in the mobile world: Are we shifting towards a psycho–civilised… Continue reading

Adam Arvidsson: Value in Ethical Economy. Part One: Brands as the third circuit of value

In an earlier landmark essay (to which I collaborated somewhat for an updated version), Adam Arvidsson had posed the key problem of our emerging era of peer production, or what he calls the ethical economy, namely that we are increasingly creating vital but hitherto ‘unacknowledgeable value‘. In this new essay, no less of a landmark… Continue reading

Stan Rhodes on the role of money in the peer economy

Stan Rhodes, which is working on his own project and vision for a “utilicontributist economy”, critically engages with Christian Siefkes alternative project. Stan Rhodes: “1. “Competition.” This word can mean several things, but for rival goods (physical goods and services), there is always competition. Even in Alfie Kohn’s book about competition (No Contest: The Case… Continue reading

Christian Siefkes on the Difference between the Peer Economy and the Market Economy

Last in the series that was originally published in Keimform.de. Christian Siefkes: “We have seen that it is indeed possible to generalize peer production to material production in such a way that its essential traits–it is based on contributions, on free cooperation, and on commons and possession–are preserved. So far, peer production has been largely… Continue reading

Marcin Jakubowski on the efficiency of open manufacturing

Marcin responded to a query on when open manufacturing could be more efficient than the current model favouring large-scale concentration: “General conditions favor large. We need to identify and tackle those. Those are the legal and financial infrastructures, which are difficult to deal with. There is subsidy and monopoly creation, financial non-transparency, and many other… Continue reading