What’s the nature of the Wikipedia bureaucracy?

Interesting study on “The Nature and Roles of Policies and Rules in Wikipedia”.

* Article: Don’t Look Now, But We’ve Created a Bureaucracy: The Nature and Roles of Policies and Rules in Wikipedia by Brian Butler, Lisa Joyce, and Jacqueline Pike.

A commentator writes:

“Many view Wikipedia as emergent, complex, messy, informal, popularly uncontrolled, non-organizational, and radically different from traditional organizations. They talk about it as if it was a utopia of freedom and independence similar to the way which early U.S. settlers viewed the new colonies. Consistent with this view, one of the founding principles of Wikipedia is “Ignore all rules,” which states that if a rule inhibits developing Wikipedia, the contributor should simply ignore it.

However, if one scratches the surface of Wikipedia by going beyond reading the article pages, one will find a complex structure of policies and rules which do lend themselves to this uncontrolled, independent view. With dozens of official policies, hundreds of rules, and more of each on the way, Wikipedia is well on its way to looking like a bureaucracy.

Scholars are examining this complex structure of policies and rules in order to better understand the nature and role of these policies and rules in Wikipedia and what developers and administrators of wikis can learn about policy formation and maintenance. Drawing from prior studies of rules and policies in a variety of contexts, including teams, traditional organizations, and legal systems, they propose different images of rules and policies, such as policies as rational efforts to organize and coordinate, constructions of meaning and identity, external signals, and negotiated settlements and trophies.”

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.