Video: Clay Shirky on creating long term groups that build something over time without incorporating
20th June 2008
via David Spark from Spark Minute
P2P Foundation
Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices
- Our Wiki
- Our Ning
- Our Reddit
- Other languages
- Greek Blog and Wiki
Sites/Publications
Bookmarks
Books
Free Software, Free SocietyCommunity
Admin
Featured Book
Cloud Time
Open Calls
- CfP: “Platform Politics” in Culture Machine
- 2012 Global Congress on Intellectual Property and the Public Interest
- Open Call: Technoscience as Activism
- The Occupy Exchange Fellowship Program
Mailing List
Subscribe
Translate
Recent Comments:
- Anon: This is precisely why the OpenUDC project was started: http://openudc.org/
- Matthew Slater: Amen! As I understand it, Bicoin consists of two separate mechanisms – the mining and the wallet system. The mining and the...
- Charles van der Haegen: This is a great article, showing the divide that has been createdin society. How can this be seen by all the other...
- David de Ugarte: Probably the most terrible fallacies of our times are: 1. «abundance equals ever increasing consumption» (neoliberal falacy) 2....
- karirin: ABundance should exists but it must be applied in real world http://fr.ekopedia.org/Hydropo nie When there will be free food, in our world...
June 21st, 2008 at 11:16 am
Good point Clay makes here.
From personal experience I can confirm that the available forms of incorporation – even the “association” which is a more informal type of group incorporation available in European countries – are far from the way things function in the network age.
Having started several of these “positive-type” groups, I always found that it was necessary to perform stupid but obligatory meetings and make documents to keep the group’s corporate form going, that have little or nothing to do with the actual work done by such a group, or really with group governance.
So if a form of incorporation or articles of association could be worked out that are more in line with how a network of interested people works together to get things done could be worked out, that would certainly be a positive step…
June 21st, 2008 at 3:29 pm
What Rene Girard says is that the group dynamics always leads to the mimetic conflict – so a group without mechanisms keeping it together, deterring violance and reducing mimetic desire between participants will always end up in disintegration. When you look at Open Source project groups – there is two differences from off-line communities. First being off-line the violence of mimetic conflict id not dangerous for people physically. Second the licensing prevents community members from destroying the accumulated community wealth (the code). This all shows how mimetic conflict, which is according to Rene Girard one of the main obstacles in sustained group action, is much less malignant in Open Source communities.
June 25th, 2008 at 4:26 pm
Having just participated in the start up of a company without any actual formal organization: annarbor.startupweekend.com/ and working this way with quite a few people, I feel that Clay Shirky is really on to something here…