Comments on: The UNESCO swosh? http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-unesco-swosh/2007/04/13 Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:37:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Nicholas Bentley http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-unesco-swosh/2007/04/13/comment-page-1#comment-59076 Nicholas Bentley Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:42:24 +0000 http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-unesco-swosh/2007/04/13#comment-59076 I don't know about redirecting brand revenues but I have had some <a href="http://p2pnet.net/index.php?page=comment&story=6929&comment=24267" rel="nofollow">thoughts in the past</a> on the possibility introducing the principles of intellectual rights to regions such as China without massive legal actions: <i>"This situation means that the Rights Office system could be introduced gradually into markets that don't traditionally support strong copyright, such as China, with the advantage that identified works would gradually become more prevalent even if unremunerated trading continued to take place. A number of advantages follow from this business model:......"</i> Also Lucy Montgomery had a good Indicare article on <a href="http://www.indicare.org/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=141" rel="nofollow">Online music markets in China</a>. I don’t know about redirecting brand revenues but I have had some thoughts in the past on the possibility introducing the principles of intellectual rights to regions such as China without massive legal actions:

“This situation means that the Rights Office system could be introduced gradually into markets that don’t traditionally support strong copyright, such as China, with the advantage that identified works would gradually become more prevalent even if unremunerated trading continued to take place. A number of advantages follow from this business model:……”

Also Lucy Montgomery had a good Indicare article on Online music markets in China.

]]>