P2P Foundation

Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices


Featured Book

How to Get What You Want Through Community Self-Government


Open Calls


Mailing List

Subscribe

Translate

  • Recent Comments:

    • happyseaurchin: nice composition… but alternatives provided show its date… imho, we need to be real, real relationships,...

    • Øyvind Holmstad: For further insight in these themes I can recommend Charles Siegel’s new book on Classical Liberalism:...

    • Øyvind Holmstad: Thesis 40 When people no longer recognize the enshrined past and choose to create a future, they have chosen to reject explanation...

    • Marvin Brown: This is the type of analysis we really need where the actual social identities of those involved in “social” projects are...

    • Øyvind Holmstad: It’s strange that Greek, where Classical Liberalism has its roots, now threatens to torn apart EU, which is founded upon...

The UNESCO swosh?

photo of Adam Arvidsson

Adam Arvidsson
13th April 2007


The US has decided to file two cases at the WTO over intellectual property. The cases are against China where the enforcement of of IP protection is notoriously lax., in particular regarding consumer brands, music and dvds, for which there is a massive cottage boot-legging industry. And they really have no reason to behave differently: most of this intellectual property belongs to countries like the US, and IP protection means little more than protecting the right of (mostly) US IP owners to siphon off excess profits form China’s booming middle class consumer market. Indeed, the fact that these objects are so frequently copied implies that, for most people in the world today, they are not perceived as particularly ‘american’ or even ‘western’, but as a common cultural property. Nike shoes is the natural aspiration of everybody , everywhere. This is of course the source of the value of the Nike brand, that people all over the world lets t matter to their everyday life, and gives it value in making it a signifier of hipness, ‘in status’, belonging to particular groups, or what have you. But if the value of Nike is something co-produced by everybody (or virtually everybody) then maybe the right to benefit form this diffuse production process should also be redefined. Why not let Nike, Coca cola, Disney be the property of UNESCO? That way brand revenues (currently billions of $ annually could be used for the general benefit of mankind, who produced these values in the first place.

by way fo the acticsblog

One Response to “The UNESCO swosh?”

  1. Nicholas Bentley Says:

    I don’t know about redirecting brand revenues but I have had some thoughts in the past on the possibility introducing the principles of intellectual rights to regions such as China without massive legal actions:

    “This situation means that the Rights Office system could be introduced gradually into markets that don’t traditionally support strong copyright, such as China, with the advantage that identified works would gradually become more prevalent even if unremunerated trading continued to take place. A number of advantages follow from this business model:……”

    Also Lucy Montgomery had a good Indicare article on Online music markets in China.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>