Comments on: The next “five year plan” of the P2P Foundation: constructing livelihood through phyles

By: Los mapas ideológicos del mundo p2p (conclusiones) | Sociedad de las Indias Electrónicas

Sat, 08 Jan 2011 18:41:40 +0000

[…] de los gráficos de los posts anteriores. No sólo porque la P2P Foundation ya haya declarado su vocación de evolucionar hacia filé, lo que sin duda generará cambios ideológicos también, sino porque una parte no menor de la […]

By: Michel Bauwens

Michel Bauwens — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:03:15 +0000

Hi David, I think you’re reading too much into Sepp’s remark. Sepp is simply worried about using concepts that are easily understood. I’m for using “phyle” myself, but we need to educate people on what it means.

Michel

By: Por qué es tan difícil trabajar con la angloeuropa

Por qué es tan difícil trabajar con la angloeuropa — Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:29:34 +0000

[…] pedirle ayuda con la intro a la Indianopedia en euskera. El otro día despertábamos con este maravilloso post de Michel Bauwens: nos hacía, nos hace, sentir honrados y pensar que la relación con la angloeuropa puede darnos […]

By: David de Ugarte

David de Ugarte — Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:21:34 +0000

Thank you Michel for the trust and the post. We feel honoured.

Dear Sepp, dont you think is too agressive to start a relationship changing the name even without knowing the causes why a thing has this concrete name and no other?

Michel, do you realize that this Sepp attitude, is one of the causes of our reluctance for dicussing in English: before any other thing the words are changed denaturalizing the meanings…

By: Michel Bauwens

Michel Bauwens — Sat, 27 Nov 2010 00:00:09 +0000

Dear Sepp: we have created a separate mailing list for those committed to the new project,

Michel

By: Sepp Hasslberger

Sepp Hasslberger — Thu, 25 Nov 2010 07:41:08 +0000

Sustainability –

This new focus in the direction of the p2p foundation brings real sustainability to the movement, not so much in an environmental way, but in a personal way as well.

If the members of a movement for change are not individually sustainable in their own lives, there is little chance for a sustainable economic and social order to emerge.

For my part, I welcome the creation of a p2p “phyle” (we might have to call it something more immediately understandable) and I believe it is proper to dedicate our efforts to the emergence of this new vehicle.