P2P Foundation

Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices


    Admin

    P2P Foundation Sites/Publications

    Worth Reading

    Introductory Essay
    Extensive Essay

    Sponsors

    Interviews

    Video

    - New P2P Video at Pixelace, Helsinki, March 2009

    Podcasts

    - Interview at Open Views by Sundar Raman, 9th March 2007
    - Interview with Richard Poynder

    Resources

    Delicious P2P tags
    P2P Blog Aggregator
    P2P Encyclopedia
    P2P Foundation Wiki
    P2P Meme Map
    P2P Movements
    P2P Podcasts
    P2P Tools
    P2P Topical Index
    P2P Webcasts
    givegetnation

    Visit our archive

  • Books


    Free Software, Free Society

    Community

    Join the P2P Community on Frappr frappr link to our community

    Want to advertise? Click here.

  • Subscribe



  • Donate

    If you value the insight and content of this site, gift us with a contribution.

  • Communities and Networks Connection
  • Recent Comments:

    • Ed Kless: Hear, hear, Rich! BTW - Since when is price based on cost. Price is based on...
    • Sepp Hasslberger: Excellent proposal by the Bolivian delegation to the World Trade...
    • Lord Metroid: The patents that Apple is suing HTC over are such ridiculus patents as...
    • Roderick T. Long: By coincidence, I was just today reading in Rick Steves’ Prague...
    • Steve Herrick: Kevin, this was a particularly interesting essay. Five years ago, I did...

  • Authors

  • The Manchester Manifesto: Who owns science?

    photo of Alessandro Delfanti

    Alessandro Delfanti
    18th December 2009


    An international group of experts on science ethics, economics, science and society, and law gathered by the University of Manchester and the Brook World Poverty Institute has produced a Manifesto focused on the problem of ownership and scientific innovation. The critique of the current way of managing intellectual property is directed towards a “dominant model (that) can be radically flawed”, at least if we want innovation to meet welfare goals at a global level and not just economic or corporate goals.

    It is easy to agree with this text, which affirms that ownership rights over scientific knowledge should be evaluated according to their effects and not as good per se. Nevertheless, the analysis of the dynamics of science’s role for welfare and development is rather superficial, and the Manifesto’s proposals are vague and not innovative with respect to the debate on IP we have had during the last ten years.

    Excerpts from the Manifesto:

    We recognise that innovation has an essential role in economic development, but its use for the  pursuit of profit should not override, and ideally should not conflict with, achievement of  welfare goals and scientific progress. Scientific information, freely and openly communicated,  adds to the body of knowledge and understanding upon which the progress of humanity depends. Information must remain available to science and this depends on open  communication and dissemination of information, including that used in innovation.

    In the final claim, the Manchester Manifesto advocates for the “use of mechanisms such as patent pools, voluntary or compulsory  licensing, and differential pricing. A range of alternative models is also possible: from those context  which are related to the current rights system such as remuneration-based patents, through  prize funds, to completely open-access models”.

    One Response to “The Manchester Manifesto: Who owns science?”

    1. Who Owns Science? « Enclosure of the Commons Says:

      [...] Owns Science? Via the P2P Foundation blog, I ran across a November 2009 manifesto published by the University of Manchester’s Institute [...]

    Leave a Reply

    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>