I found myself mostly in agreement with her, except when she went into the supposed downsides of unschooling. Many of these things, it was a bit much to blame on unschooling! For example the inequality of govt. “education”; she had the example where one set of kids only has $8000 spent on them, and another set got $18,000. Perhaps she is not familiar with the Kansas City Desegregation experiment?
http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-298.html
The point is, having government money spent on indoctrination of children is never a good thing. The thing to hope for is when government stops spending any money at all on it.
Also her comment that she “supports the cause of public schooling”, left a taste of cognitive dissonance. After all, here she is talking about unschooling, something undeniably better than any government “education” and also something that literally anyone can do. I don’t know, the “liberal guilt” that came out didn’t seem to add much of value to the talk.
But these are picking nits, of course. Everyone’s got a worldview, and some have pretty silly worldviews. It doesn’t mean they have nothing of value to say. It just means you have to filter that stuff out.
]]>point taken!
]]>