P2P Foundation

Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices


Featured Book

Digitally Enabled Social Change


Open Calls


Mailing List

Subscribe

Translate

  • Recent Comments:

    • Øyvind Holmstad: “(The Appendix to this essay reprints a review of Alexander’s “A Pattern Language” that I wrote for Amazon.com).”:...

    • Sepp Hasslberger: Great post and good observation by Eric that the word “gift” is really a link into the old type of rigid market....

    • Øyvind Holmstad: We just republished an essay from this blog by Nikos Salingaros yesterday, about these themes: - Peer-to-Peer Themes and Urban...

    • Øyvind Holmstad: This is EXACTLY what CLASSICAL LIBERALISM is ALL ABOUT: http://www.preservenet.com/cla ssicalliberalism/index.html

    • Patrick Anderson: The author writes: > Everyone should earn a profit for their work Profit is never the result of work! Profit is the difference...

The different aspects of peer governance

photo of Michel Bauwens

Michel Bauwens
31st August 2006


For some time now, we have been compiling a directory of concepts related to the emergence of peer governance.

The key aspects of peer governance are Anti-credentialism , Communal Validation, Equipotentiality, and Holoptism . The Open Co-op Project has tried to formalize a number of characteristics of such Open Organizations.

I think it is important to distinguish the peer governance of specific distributed networks and communities, i.e. of peer producing communities which are often “plural monocultures“, from the governance of the political sphere as a whole, which is a decentralized, and not distributed, network with competing power centers. Here, we will not have the pure peer governance models, but rather peer-inspired models, such as multistakeholdership-based models of governance.

In order to clarify this distinction, I have selected a number of entries under 4 headings: 1) the peer governance of peer producing communities; 2) the forms of ownership/distribution that can be used for the market-oriented derivative firms that are sustained by such commons; 3) the forms of management that can be used; 4) the peer-inspired forms of political governance.

Here they are:

1. the forms of peer governance of open/free communities and peer production groups

Burning Man – Governance , Free Software Foundation , FLOSS – Governance , FLOSS Foundations , GNOME Foundation , Mozilla Foundation
2. the forms of governance/ownership/income distribution for the derived and monetizable service and market-oriented production models that derive from commons-related projects

Capital Commons Trusts , Cooperatives , Limited Liability Partnership , Mutual Home Ownership , Open Organization
3. the forms of management that can be used

Chaordic Organizations – Characteristics , Consensus , Consent vs. Consensus , Coordination Format , Council Ceremony , Harmonization Governance , Heterarchy , Holacracy , Horizontal Accountablity , Leaderless Organizations , Open Organization , Sociocracy

4. political governance models for the whole of society that are inspired by peer to peer models or principles

Citizen Dialogue and Deliberation , Commons , Community Assets , Coordination Format , Council Ceremony , Delegative Democracy , Deliberative Democracy , Deliberative Development , Democracy 2.1 , Disaggregated Democracy , Extreme Democracy , Gaian Democracies , Global Microstructures , Global Villages , Glocalized Networks , Inclusive Democracy , Megacommunities , Participatory Democracy Networks

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>