P2P Foundation

Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices


Featured Book

How to Get What You Want Through Community Self-Government


Open Calls


Mailing List

Subscribe

Translate

  • Recent Comments:

    • happyseaurchin: nice composition… but alternatives provided show its date… imho, we need to be real, real relationships,...

    • Øyvind Holmstad: For further insight in these themes I can recommend Charles Siegel’s new book on Classical Liberalism:...

    • Øyvind Holmstad: Thesis 40 When people no longer recognize the enshrined past and choose to create a future, they have chosen to reject explanation...

    • Marvin Brown: This is the type of analysis we really need where the actual social identities of those involved in “social” projects are...

    • Øyvind Holmstad: It’s strange that Greek, where Classical Liberalism has its roots, now threatens to torn apart EU, which is founded upon...

The crisis of value is for real: Return on assets has declined by 75% since 1965

photo of Michel Bauwens

Michel Bauwens
6th November 2009


The video below is a panel discussion on “the new world of work in a web squared world’, introduced by John Hagel.

It contains a very interesting passage, starting just before the four minute break: the return on assets (for publicly listed companies in the U.S.) has declined, by an incredible 75%, since 1975.

This is a good illustration, and confirmation, of the reality of the Crisis of Value that Adam Arvidsson and myself have been talking about.

Details from the original Big Shift report which originated these findings are below.

The falling return on assets:

“The Impact Index measures how well companies are exploiting the foundational changes in the capabilities of the digital infrastructure by creating and sharing knowledge and what impact those changes are having on markets, firms and individuals.

According to Impact Index metrics:

* U.S. firms’ ROA has steadily fallen to almost one-quarter of 1965 levels at the same time that we have seen improvements in labor productivity

* The ROA performance gap between corporate winners and losers has increased over time, with the “winners” barely maintaining previous performance levels while the losers experience rapid performance deterioration — falling from positive returns in 1965 to largely negative ones today

* The “topple rate” at which big companies lose their leadership positions has more than doubled, suggesting the “winners” have increasingly precarious positions.”

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>