P2P Foundation

Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices


Featured Book

Cloud Time


Open Calls


Mailing List

Subscribe

Translate

  • Recent Comments:

    • David de Ugarte: Probably the most terrible fallacies of our times are: 1. «abundance equals ever increasing consumption» (neoliberal falacy) 2....

    • karirin: ABundance should exists but it must be applied in real world http://fr.ekopedia.org/Hydropo nie When there will be free food, in our world...

    • Tom Crowl: This is great stuff! It might be assumed that I “LOVE” money in politics… (since I’m advocating more people...

    • Tom Crowl: Let me confront an obvious question (to me anyway)… since I’m zealously advocating the political micro-contribution as...

    • Jaap: You are spot on. Hierarchies are outdated and do not work any more. The Dilbert (model for modern knowledge worker) and his boss show that...

Peter Linebaugh on the Social and Etymological History of the Relation between the Concepts of ‘Communism’ and the ‘Commons’

photo of Michel Bauwens

Michel Bauwens
7th January 2011


* Paper: PETER LINEBAUGH — MEANDERING ON THE SEMANTICAL-HISTORICAL PATHS OF COMMUNISM AND COMMONS. The Commoner. Winter 2010.

Peter Linebaugh, the great historian of the commons, has written an interesting historical essay on the inter-relationship of these two contested terms.

From the conclusion:

“In the 1840s, then, ‘communism’ was the new name to express the revolutionary aspirations of proletarians . It pointed to the future, as in ‘historic tasks’. In contrast, the ‘commons’ belonged to the past, perhaps to the feudal era, when it was the last-ditch defense against extinction.

Now in the 21st century the semantics of the two terms seems to be reversed with communism belonging to the past of Stalinism, industrialization of agriculture, and militarism, while the commons belongs to an international debate about the planetary future of land, water, and subsistence for all. movements of the common people who have been enclosed and foreclosed but are beginning to disclose an alternative, open future.

In conclusion, various forms of commoning, some traditional and some not, provided the proletariat with means of survival in the struggle against capitalism. Commoning is a basis of proletarian class solidarity, and we can find this before, during, and after both the semantic and the political birth of communism.”

Share

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>