Historically this has been the outcome in the great majority of situations
The first one is the path less travelled, the most difficult one
Nicolo Machiavelli (in the Prince) has beautifully analyzed the reasons for this unsatisfactory outcome:
“It ought to be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things. Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new. This coolness arises partly from fear of the opponents, who have the laws on their side, and partly from the incredulity of men, who do not readily believe in new things until they have had a long experience of them.”
Let this be a warning to all those who busy themselves fiercely defending increasingly indefensible privileges. Let it also be a warning to all the lukewarm incredulous by-standers… Revolution is a dramatic Lose-Lose, evolution can/should be constructed as a Win-Win…
]]>