P2P Foundation

Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices


Featured Book

Cloud Time


Open Calls


Mailing List

Subscribe

Translate

  • Recent Comments:

    • David de Ugarte: Probably the most terrible fallacies of our times are: 1. «abundance equals ever increasing consumption» (neoliberal falacy) 2....

    • karirin: ABundance should exists but it must be applied in real world http://fr.ekopedia.org/Hydropo nie When there will be free food, in our world...

    • Tom Crowl: This is great stuff! It might be assumed that I “LOVE” money in politics… (since I’m advocating more people...

    • Tom Crowl: Let me confront an obvious question (to me anyway)… since I’m zealously advocating the political micro-contribution as...

    • Jaap: You are spot on. Hierarchies are outdated and do not work any more. The Dilbert (model for modern knowledge worker) and his boss show that...

Online and blended learning is NOT automated delivery of facts, and NOT less work for teachers

photo of Michel Bauwens

Michel Bauwens
26th May 2011


A warning from Howard Rheingold, which first appeared as a Facebook ‘note’:

“I’m disturbed by the hype about online learning as a “disruptive” force in education. I started reading Clay Christensen’s book with enthusiasm, because I like his ideas about disruptive innovation, but was jaw-droppingly disenthused when it became clear that he thought online learning is all about 21st century versions of teaching machines. There is a lot of value — for motivated self-learners and procedural subjects such as algebra or electrical engineering — in the Khan academy model. But real learning is social, collaborative, involving inquiry and discourse. In my Stanford, Berkeley, Rheingold U courses, online and blended learning have led to exciting outcomes. But I don’t evangelize online learning as any kind of solution to education system problems because it requires MORE work from teachers. It is necessary to set up and provoke discussions, model behavior, facilitate collaboration, and — most important at the beginning — to respond to each student in a thoughtful manner that will be useful for the student. This is time-consuming. I don’t want to advocate a solution that makes teachers work more without more pay. Neither do I think purely online learning is effective with solo learners except in the circumstances I mentioned — a bright and self-motivated learner who wants to learn partial differential equations, or the Krebs cycle, which can be conveyed through online video lectures and screencasts, for example. But many subjects cannot be learned by a download of facts or how-to. They need to be discussed, inquired into, debated, pursued as collaborative projects. This requires discussion boards, blogs, wikis, and other interactive media that include a community of learners.”

Share

2 Responses to “Online and blended learning is NOT automated delivery of facts, and NOT less work for teachers”

  1. Eric K. Says:

    Don’t worry calm down man

    Work disapear, the need for education disapear

    teacher disapear

    middle and upper class disapear

    this is neo feodalism

    good luck this is your turn

  2. yosef shuman Says:

    Another facet of education which my teachers often spoke about, but not even mentioned by Howard: Often education isn’t even about the material taught, it’s about “learning to learn”.

    I can pick up a Lynda.com tutorial just like anyone else, but will that build the skills I need to learn things in my real life, socially, or the business world?

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>