P2P Foundation

Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices


Featured Book

Cloud Time


Open Calls


Mailing List

Subscribe

Translate

  • Recent Comments:

    • David de Ugarte: Probably the most terrible fallacies of our times are: 1. «abundance equals ever increasing consumption» (neoliberal falacy) 2....

    • karirin: ABundance should exists but it must be applied in real world http://fr.ekopedia.org/Hydropo nie When there will be free food, in our world...

    • Tom Crowl: This is great stuff! It might be assumed that I “LOVE” money in politics… (since I’m advocating more people...

    • Tom Crowl: Let me confront an obvious question (to me anyway)… since I’m zealously advocating the political micro-contribution as...

    • Jaap: You are spot on. Hierarchies are outdated and do not work any more. The Dilbert (model for modern knowledge worker) and his boss show that...

New modes of leadership for a participatory age

photo of Michel Bauwens

Michel Bauwens
13th May 2007


Vasilis Kostakis is a Greek Msc student at the economic and business faculty of the University of Amsterdam. He is working on a thesis “Laser Theory and Peer-to-Peer: Redefinition of the Society in the Information Age”, which he started to explain here.

As I understand it, the metaphor of the laser, as thousands concentrated points of light, seeks to determine under which conditions distributed efforts can be effective as a strategy for social change, and thus also, where it is not effective.

Vasilis started a blog to document the progress of his project. In the blog, he also started an interview process and asked me a number of questions, which helped me draw out some of my more recent insights.

One questions concerns the new type of leadership in peer-based communities which I identify as being both a priori invitational and a posteriori arbitrage, but staying clear of the production process itself; I deal with what I believe is the somewhat misleading concept of benevolent dictatorship; the other question concerns how the formulation of a peer to peer theory of social change, is related to earlier egalitarian traditions, such as Maxism and anarchism, and I try to show how it indeed differs.

The first 3 questions of the interview process are here.

Share

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>