Liquid Publications as an alternative to Peer Review
Via Geert Lovink.
Liquid Publications is an alternative vision of collaborative scholarship that does require peer review,
Geert Lovink introduces the context for this new concept:
“ Gloria Origgi of interdisciplines.org spoke. She is an Italian philosopher, based in Paris at the CNRS, who works on trust and reputation. The old system of ranking the reputation of academics are still in place but are crumbling from the inside. What is necessary is a Facebook for academic activities. There is a website for this now called Liquid Publication, which promotes new ways of working outside of writing academic papers. This could be one of the ways to get rid of Publish or Perish logic. The paper is still at the centre of the digital publishing. This initiative wants to question the dominance of the current format and centrality of the academic paper. One of the new cultural practices that can be introduced is the testimony. We start to use technologies to annotate information. Think of the cameras on the mobile phone. What is necessary is that the academic involvement in blogs etc. is fully recognized. The obsession of measuring performance only through academic papers needs to be openly criticized. It would be timely (my suggestion) to unleash a social movement against academic paperism so that other forms of academic knowledge will also be valued and appreciated.”
From their own website:
“In a nutshell, the approach proposes the following ideas and contributions:
1. It introduces the notion of Liquid Publications (and, analogously, Liquid Textbooks) as evolutionary, collaborative, multi-faceted knowledge objects that can be composed and consumed at different levels of detail.
2. It abstracts (and replaces) the notions of journals and conferences into collections, which are groupings of publications that can be based on topic and time but also on arbitrary rules in terms of what is included and how the quality of publications is assessed for them to be included in the collection. Collections can themselves be liquid. We believe that journals as they are conceived today (a periodic snapshot of papers on a given topic, selected by a restricted group of experts and based on submissions) will soon become obsolete both in their printed and electronic forms.
3. It proposes a radically different evaluation method for publications and for authors, based on the interest they generate in the community and on their innovative contributions and that is maintained in real time and possibly without reviewing effort (peer reviews can be used as a complement). The method also encourages early dissemination of innovative results. Around these main concepts, we advocate the need for services that benefit authors, readers, reviewers, conference organizers, editorial boards, and even evaluation committees. Examples of such services are an analysis center for helping committees to assess the scientific quality of people and publications, ways for people to bookmark papers or people of interest and to define collections, and an authoring/sharing/versioning environment for maintaining and evolving liquid publications and for the fruition of their content.
Although the change advocated here is dramatic, the transition is not. The current state of affair in knowledge dissemination is at an extreme of the Liquid Publication concepts, where papers are “solid” and static, collections are periodic snapshots of submissions, and evaluation is based on peer review by a team of “experts”. The liquefaction and embracing of the concepts proposed here can be gradual to facilitate acceptance by the community at large.”
October 12th, 2008 at 8:46 am
Great idea, but is it operational?
December 1st, 2008 at 6:32 am
Liquid publications is a fantastic concept because it allows for creativity.
Ways of knowing are infinite.
Anyone should peer review the paper online and so judgement is broad spectrum.