P2P Foundation

Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices



  • Subscribe



  • Donate

    If you value the insight and content of this site, gift us with a contribution.

  • Communities and Networks Connection
  • Recent Comments:

    • Phil Hyde: Michel Bauens’ Proposals for anti-meltdown policies, partially...
    • Patrick Anderson: This is terrifying, but easily solved if we will wake-up to a few...
    • Eb Kremer: Goh, een mooi verhaal Jaap; zoals ik je ken. Arnold stuurde het me door....
    • sabine relation: Wow! That’s amazing! I really don’t think people know all...
    • Glyn Moody: So let’s call them what they really are: time-limited intellectual...

  • Authors

  • How open can proprietary platforms be?

    photo of Michel Bauwens

    Michel Bauwens
    17th May 2008


    Gigaom presents a comparative overview on the portability initiatives recently taken or promised by MySpace, Facebook, and Google. Neither truly open nor entirely closed, they fall somewhere in between control and ultimate user freedom, and Gigaom gives us some criteria to judge the degree of openness.

    Stacy writes:

    “There’s open source (really open in that anyone with knowledge can participate in how the code evolves), open standards (open only in that anyone can participate using a pre-defined version of the standard), and open APIs (open in that anyone can take the pre-defined standard and build something for a closed platform such as Facebook). Knowing this, the efforts to open up a user’s data on a social network (their social graph, if you will) by these three companies falls somewhere between an open platform and an open standard.”

    table via GigaOm

    Leave a Reply

    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

     

    Video & Audio Comments are proudly powered by Riffly