P2P Foundation

Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices


Featured Book

Digitally Enabled Social Change


Open Calls


Mailing List

Subscribe

Translate

  • Recent Comments:

    • Øyvind Holmstad: “(The Appendix to this essay reprints a review of Alexander’s “A Pattern Language” that I wrote for Amazon.com).”:...

    • Sepp Hasslberger: Great post and good observation by Eric that the word “gift” is really a link into the old type of rigid market....

    • Øyvind Holmstad: We just republished an essay from this blog by Nikos Salingaros yesterday, about these themes: - Peer-to-Peer Themes and Urban...

    • Øyvind Holmstad: This is EXACTLY what CLASSICAL LIBERALISM is ALL ABOUT: http://www.preservenet.com/cla ssicalliberalism/index.html

    • Patrick Anderson: The author writes: > Everyone should earn a profit for their work Profit is never the result of work! Profit is the difference...

The political economy of peer production: Adam Arvidsson and the Ethical Economy

photo of Sam Rose

Sam Rose
19th November 2007


I’ve just returned from Nottingham, UK., where I participated in the first-ever academic workshop on p2p concepts, a conference/workshop on “the political economies of peer production”.

I plan on giving a review of each presentation in blog postings here. This first post is about Adam Arvidsson’s amazing, and thought provoking presentation on what he is calling the “Ethical Economy”.

(I am reviewing Adam’s presentation first, because my notes ended up being most complete on his. I plan on reviewing all other presentations here as well, once I have a chance to reconstruct and map them).

This review will be in my words, and mostly paraphrased, but I’ll do my best to stay faithful to the vision that Adam was communicating.

Adam’s idea about an “ethical economy” is basically a new human-centric economy, that is emerging out of materialistic economy that has dominated the world for over a century now.

Adam’s compelling arguments include:

  • That “talent” is not what is valuable. This is a flaw, and problem in the theories of people such as Richard Florida, who believe that the presence of creative people will spur economic growth and activity. Adam Arvidsson instead argues that it is the creation of creative industries which package, brand and sell content, that spur economic growth.
  • That states, and mega-corporations are adapting, and will adapt to play a supportive role in the emergence of “ethical economies”, as their old roles of being leading/controlling entities are obsoleted
  • That the only areas of sustainable growth for the future of capitalism are in immaterial production
  • That emerging value is contingent on the production, and growth of community (instead of the production and growth of material wealth). Value is no longer compressed into “price” (my words -S.R.). Ethics are now taken into equal consideration, because they are needed to sustain community, which is the emerging root of “value” (my paraphrasings S.R.).

Many people in the conference responded to ask, basically “how will we make a living in this new economy”, if value is no longer centered on materialistic gain. Indeed, this is the problem we all face, but it is also simultaneously the opportunity that is currently wide open, and wating, for people to build out new types of wealth.

I’ve created a dialogue map, that attempts to show Adam’s key points, and conceptual connections between them. I made this dialogue map while Adam gave his presentation. One interesting thing to note is that all arguments point toward the building, support, and sustaining of community as the answer to the questions that the ethical economy raises (“Value is contingent on the construction/sutainence/producing of community in the ethical economy. Communities depend on ethics for cohesion/sustainability”).

(click on image above to see map full size).

2 Responses to “The political economy of peer production: Adam Arvidsson and the Ethical Economy”

  1. Kare Anderson Says:

    Spot-on: “it is the creation of creative industries which package, brand and sell content, that spur economic growth.”
    but this message may not be as “sexy” – to captivate the media and conference audiences. I am speaking as someone who works in both arenas.

  2. Marcin Says:

    This model does not acknowledge natural resource extraction and material production, and how that is addressed in an ethical economy. Unless we address these issues, we do not have a testable program of action. In particular, the issues of scale reduction in natural resource extraction/processing have to be acknowledged – how do we turn this into ethical production? This to me is the key to the open source economy. Physical production, starting with available feedstocks – is relatively easy to do within 5-10 years. That still does not acknowledge primary feedstocks – which I think will be the next frontier after said physical production is opensourced.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>