P2P Foundation

Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices


Featured Book

No Straight Lines


Open Calls


Mailing List

Subscribe

Translate

  • Recent Comments:

    • Øyvind Holmstad: “(The Appendix to this essay reprints a review of Alexander’s “A Pattern Language” that I wrote for Amazon.com).”:...

    • Sepp Hasslberger: Great post and good observation by Eric that the word “gift” is really a link into the old type of rigid market....

    • Øyvind Holmstad: We just republished an essay from this blog by Nikos Salingaros yesterday, about these themes: - Peer-to-Peer Themes and Urban...

    • Øyvind Holmstad: This is EXACTLY what CLASSICAL LIBERALISM is ALL ABOUT: http://www.preservenet.com/cla ssicalliberalism/index.html

    • Patrick Anderson: The author writes: > Everyone should earn a profit for their work Profit is never the result of work! Profit is the difference...

Dialogue with Ryan Lanham, Andy Robinson, and Michel Bauwens on “Intellectual Property”

photo of Kevin Carson

Kevin Carson
13th February 2010


I’ve attempted to organize two debate threads on the P2P list on the subject of “intellectual property” into a single document (warning–pdf).  It’s very long–about 45 pages–because it’s extracted from threads totalling nearly two hundred separate posts, some of them quite long.

I have attempted to break up the posts into snippets and nest them, with indentations, to make it clear what each snippet is immediately in response to.  That means the documents are not chronological.  Rather, the snippets on the left hand margin are generally the oldest, and get newer as they’re indented further in.

I hope it’s self-explanatory and not too confusing.  It’s loosely based on the flow-sheet techniques used by debate judges.  I also apologize for the pdf format, but it was extremely difficult to work WordPress’s indentations properly in the earlier post on my exchange with Richard Stallman, with far fewer posts and far fewer (three as opposed to about twelve, I think) layers of nested responses.  Anyway, I figured the discussions were worth preserving in a single place more accessible than the list archives.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>