P2P Foundation

Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices


    Admin

    P2P Foundation Sites/Publications

    Worth Reading

    Introductory Essay
    Extensive Essay

    Sponsors

    Interviews

    Video

    - New P2P Video at Pixelace, Helsinki, March 2009

    Podcasts

    - Interview at Open Views by Sundar Raman, 9th March 2007
    - Interview with Richard Poynder

    Resources

    Delicious P2P tags
    P2P Blog Aggregator
    P2P Encyclopedia
    P2P Foundation Wiki
    P2P Meme Map
    P2P Movements
    P2P Podcasts
    P2P Tools
    P2P Topical Index
    P2P Webcasts
    givegetnation

    Visit our archive

  • Books


    Free Software, Free Society

    Community

    Join the P2P Community on Frappr frappr link to our community

    Want to advertise? Click here.

  • Subscribe



  • Donate

    If you value the insight and content of this site, gift us with a contribution.

  • Communities and Networks Connection
  • Recent Comments:

    • rachel: well its true that kens work is great, and some of these critics are downright...
    • Michel Bauwens: This contribution from Jeff Vail, sent by email, is not directly...
    • Michel Bauwens: Commentary by Eric Hunting, via email: Apple has, ironically, always...
    • Michel Bauwens: Feel free to post it as a comment, and we can upgrade it to an article,...
    • laws and liberty: Lol, I wouldn’t have said that personally, but this is a very...

  • Authors

  • Are Generic Biologics Impossible?

    photo of Sepp Hasslberger

    Sepp Hasslberger
    22nd October 2009


    Democracy in Action is hosting a campaign for the inclusion of a workable path towards the approval of generic versions of biologics, into healthcare reform legislation. Apparently, biologics are more than 20 times as expensive as your normal run-of-the mill pharmaceutical drug. There seems to be a certain reluctance on the part of pharmaceutical producers to give up that price advantage.

    According to Merck’s website, “biologic drugs are complex products that can be derived from viruses, blood and body tissues, antibodies, toxins and antitoxins, vaccines, and related products used for treating disease.”

    They differ from traditional drugs, which are called “small-molecule agents because the active ingredient is usually a single, discrete chemical entity.”

    Merck also states that “until now, it has not been possible to develop generic versions of these products because of their complex manufacturing requirements and the difficulty in defining their exact composition. Companies have made several attempts to get approval for generic equivalent biological products, such as human growth hormone. However, the Food and Drug Administration has required manufacturers of the proposed products to submit for approval under new drug regulations rather than as a generic equivalent.”

    Democracy in Action confirms that there is currently no legislative pathway to manufacture and get approval for a biologic drug’s generic equivalent. Their proposed letter to Congress spells out the situation:

    Unfortunately, the mechanism for generic or “follow-on” biologics built into Senate HELP Committee and House Energy and Commerce Committee versions of health care reform threaten to effectively block generic competition by granting 12 years of monopoly protection through data exclusivity (other medicines get only 5 years) in addition to the patent protection that biologic drugs already receive. In addition, companies can make relatively inexpensive tweaks to their drugs (for instance by changing from two injections a day to one) and extend this protection for another 12 years… over and over again. That’s an additional 12 years of high prices that they can turn into a perpetual monopoly. In other words, this purported generic biologics proposal will actually PREVENT biologic generics.

    Big Pharma charges 22 times more for biologics than for other drugs, despite comparable R&D costs and biologic drugs already account for 43% of Medicare Part B drug spending. Done right, in the first decade, biogenerics could save patients and our healthcare system as much as $71 billion, making lifesaving medicines available to many patients who now have to do without.

    But there is still time to fix this by making a true path for affordable generic biologics. Representative Henry Waxman and Senator Charles Schumer have proposed generic biologics legislation (H 1427/S 726) that grants the same amount of protection given to traditional drugs, 5 years, and prevents abusive practices that allow companies to extend that protection indefinitely.

    For more information on this and to email or fax Congress:
    .

    Leave a Reply

    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>