P2P Foundation

Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices


    Admin

    P2P Foundation Sites/Publications

    Worth Reading

    Introductory Essay
    Extensive Essay

    Sponsors

    Interviews

    Video

    - New P2P Video at Pixelace, Helsinki, March 2009

    Podcasts

    - Interview at Open Views by Sundar Raman, 9th March 2007
    - Interview with Richard Poynder

    Resources

    Delicious P2P tags
    P2P Blog Aggregator
    P2P Encyclopedia
    P2P Foundation Wiki
    P2P Meme Map
    P2P Movements
    P2P Podcasts
    P2P Tools
    P2P Topical Index
    P2P Webcasts
    givegetnation

    Visit our archive

  • Books


    Free Software, Free Society

    Community

    Join the P2P Community on Frappr frappr link to our community

    Want to advertise? Click here.

  • Subscribe



  • Donate

    If you value the insight and content of this site, gift us with a contribution.

  • Communities and Networks Connection
  • Recent Comments:

    • rachel: well its true that kens work is great, and some of these critics are downright...
    • Michel Bauwens: This contribution from Jeff Vail, sent by email, is not directly...
    • Michel Bauwens: Commentary by Eric Hunting, via email: Apple has, ironically, always...
    • Michel Bauwens: Feel free to post it as a comment, and we can upgrade it to an article,...
    • laws and liberty: Lol, I wouldn’t have said that personally, but this is a very...

  • Authors

  • Android, the iPhone, and the law of asymmetrical competition

    photo of Michel Bauwens

    Michel Bauwens
    23rd February 2009


    Umair Haque:

    Light beats heavy. Open beats closed. Free beats paid. Good beats evil.

    Glyn Moody (in ComputerWorld) applies the law of asymmetrical competition, i.e. that open beats closed, to the struggle between iPhone and Android, predicting that in the field of software (not hardware!), the openness of Android will mean that the iPhone capabilities will be eventually surpassed.

    Read the whole article for the detailed examples that he gives, but here’s the gist of the argument:

    Glyn Moody:

    “The openness of the Android platform means that developers will have a freedom those working with the iPhone can only dream of. In terms of hacking the G1, that may be of limited appeal, but elsewhere it is crucially important, notably for handset manufacturers and mobile companies. The former will be able to port Android to more or less any model, and to add such bells and whistles as they wish. And yet even this is not the most important aspect of such portability.

    Where I believe that the Android platform will really score is outside the mobile domain. For not only can the code be ported to other mobiles, it can be used for – well, anything. The obvious application is for the rather nebulous Mobile Internet Devices (MIDs), but here’s an even more interesting possibility: netbooks.”

    This video explains Android’s: Applications Without Borders:

    One Response to “Android, the iPhone, and the law of asymmetrical competition”

    1. dean collins Says:

      Posted at: http://deancollinsblog.blogspot.com/2009/02/m4change-android-observations.html

      I was at a Mobile Barcamp last weekend one of the most interesting quotes I heard all day was from an Android developer

      “My application does 4 things….all of which are not possible on the iphone”

      Basically his entire application couldn’t be built for or even run on the iPhone and that’s even assuming that Apple would actually approve and pass his application.

      I think the winds of change are coming, it might take a while because of distributed application stores and multiple handset manufacturers but all the really cool apps you are going to see will be built on the Android platform and the uncool kids will be left using iPhones.

      Cheers,
      Dean

    Leave a Reply

    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>