P2P Foundation

Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices


    Admin

    P2P Foundation Sites/Publications

    Worth Reading

    Introductory Essay
    Extensive Essay

    Sponsors

    Interviews

    Video

    - New P2P Video at Pixelace, Helsinki, March 2009

    Podcasts

    - Interview at Open Views by Sundar Raman, 9th March 2007
    - Interview with Richard Poynder

    Resources

    Delicious P2P tags
    P2P Blog Aggregator
    P2P Encyclopedia
    P2P Foundation Wiki
    P2P Meme Map
    P2P Movements
    P2P Podcasts
    P2P Tools
    P2P Topical Index
    P2P Webcasts
    givegetnation

    Visit our archive

  • Books


    Free Software, Free Society

    Community

    Join the P2P Community on Frappr frappr link to our community

    Want to advertise? Click here.

  • Subscribe



  • Communities and Networks Connection
  • Recent Comments:


  • Authors

  • A statement on P2P and Post-Scarcity Thinking

    photo of Michel Bauwens

    Michel Bauwens
    14th September 2009


    !NTRODUCTION

    We know we don´t speak for everybody, since we are a pluralistic community and we seek commonalities between divergent views, but that does not mean that we don’t have a concern about the efficiency of what we are doing. In this context, we feel the need to distinguish the P2P theory view from post scarcity assumptions that have received such a prominent place on our mailing list.

    To make a strong statement: P2P is not about post – scarcity, but about restoring the right balance between scarcity and abundance – which is an alltogether different thing.

    It does not believe that technology by itself provides any complete social solution, but it is always embedded in and driven by particular social and political logics

    For example, automation is very much driven by capitalist competition to be more productive than other market players. It is absolutely not sure that autonomous communities would choose to totally abolish manual work. It is totally legitimate that communities or countries would choose industrious development paths preserving and augmenting direct human involvement in material production.

    For example, an agricultural community may want to preserve its traditional ways of life – and that is a freedom we want everybody to have.

    Maybe we can say that our contacts with local activist communities have made us aware that the identification with post-scarcity thinking is politically problematic – in particular the image of the „magical technical fix“.

    We do not want to stop the dialogue, but we would like to make clear that no consensus can be assumed on that – and as a movement we do not want to be identified with it. It is not a central message, it is merely the hope of some, of people that we respect but also who carry a much stronger burden of proof. People who make extraordinary claims are bound more than others to show practical implementations.

    All the material we have in the P2P wiki are actually existing projects and it is out of the observation of these existing social practises that we draw our conclusions.

    STRATEGY

    P2P is operating in a world which is characterised by 2 main factors, mostly wrongly perceived:

    Scarcity of natural resources, which is increasingly accelerated by a dysfunctional mode of production and is putting us into ever more serious planetary management problems. We are in friendly terms with the environmental movement(s) that adresses these issues and becomes more practical every day (renewables, solar, distributed energy…)

    Our own priority as P2P movement is adressing the second factor, which is the enclosure of the intellectual and scientific and cultural commons which is being addressed by the „Open Everything Movements“. Opening up the realm of ideas and allowing the massive collaboration of the general intellect of the world is an essential condition of mastering the ecological crisis and to the fulfillment of the better promises and achievements of our civilisation through the building of a new civilisation or rather new culture.

    But there is a third necessary factor that is crucial for a thrivable solution which would allow for further human evolution: without true active participation of all in the design and production of our material life, without the involvement of the majority of human beings into the effort to find a new social contract, we will not be able to reach the goals of a better life on this planet. Therefore P2P has to join forces with the third mass movement on this planet, which could roughly be characterized as the social justice movemen, involving the struggles of workers, farmers, entrepreneurs and knowledge workers.

    We currenly see a strategic convergence of these three movements and we think it is our own responsibility to help make it happen. We believe that a perceived identification between P2P and post scarcity is counter to that goal, because post-scarcity is intentionally ignoring important issues raised by the other two movements, ecological and social justice movement.

    Michel Bauwens, P2P Foundation
    Franz Nahrada, Global Villages Network

    Leave a Reply

    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>