P2P Foundation

Researching, documenting and promoting peer to peer practices


Featured Book

Misunderstanding the Internet


Open Calls


Mailing List

Subscribe

Translate

  • Recent Comments:

    • Øyvind Holmstad: “In this regard it attains the radical democratic ideal of unanimous consent of the governed, which is never completely...

    • Øyvind Holmstad: No, the commons cannot work through more free time, the commons can only occur through pattern languages maintaining the human...

    • Steve Herrick: The link should be: this.

    • Carlos Boyle: Muro Walf says, about Elisabeth Noelle Neumann’s the Spiral of Silence, that people prioresses “where to position them selves ”...

    • Øyvind Holmstad: Have you heard about the “universal scaling law” by Nikos Salingaros: http://meandering-through-m...

A cultural intelligence critique of Kurzweil and Lanier

photo of Michel Bauwens

Michel Bauwens
23rd June 2011


Excerpted from a presentation by collective intelligence theorist Pierre Levy:

“Kurzweil’s singularity is purely based on techno science and ignores almost completely the cultural and social evolution. This is his main flaw, in my opinion. By contrast, I think that the main revolution ahead is not bio-mechanical but cultural. It will be a transformation linked to new writing systems, a new literacy and a radical scientific revolution in humanities that will exploit the ocean of digital data and the automatic symbol manipulation (computing power) that is now available. We still don’t have any strong and valuable intellectual tradition for the use of the digital medium because it is only one or two generations old. But it is our responsibility of scholars and humanists to build it and to recollect and enhance in this new tradition the hermeneutic knowledge that we inherited from our predecessors.

Several years ago, Lanier predicted the triumph of virtual reality and the dismissal of symbolic systems because he thought that humans would soon interact mainly in a sensori-motor way in 3D virtual worlds. At the time, I strongly disagreed with him. The experience proved that he was completely wrong. He is still wrong today in his condemnation of collaborative intelligence because – again – he ignores symbolism. He cannot imagine the emergence of (still unknown) intellectual and social conventions that will accommodate the new technical conditions of communication. By contrast, my predictions of the merging of computer networks and hypertexts (in 1990, before the Web), my forecasting of the emergence of new forms of collective intelligence in the digital medium (in 1994) and my general description of cyber culture as a socio-cultural mutation in a new “social medium” (1997) were rather correct…”

Share

One Response to “A cultural intelligence critique of Kurzweil and Lanier”

  1. happyseaurchin Says:

    Why don’t people bite the bullet about this?

    We have the singularity, where everything technological disappears up its own ass, and by particular lame comparison “social evolution”. Surely, if we are going to have any balls about this, the equivalent social movement to the singularity is a form of world peace? No?

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>